Film Noir Buff Style Forum / The case against Russell Street

Mark Miwords · 2012-10-09 02:27:14

From Ivy Style today, from me to Chelsea Drug Store:

"I still think that attempts to understand and explain away are a mistake. You seek to humanise inhuman behaviour and find motives which defend the indefensible. To do this is to join in with somebody else’s game. As I have said to you before, if we are talking about who I think we are then you are dealing with a pack of lies. It is as simple as that. A.N.Other would just seem to love winding people up."

Street is a serial offender, I have even compared him to a serial killer in the past. His behaviour patterns are set and inflexible. Witness the following:

1. Trad. He encourages the trusting into fantasy and then mocks them.

2. Talk Ivy. See above.

3. Ivy Style. See above.

It's the same thing over and over again and new people keep on falling for it. Perverse is the only adjective which truly sums up Russell Street. What other word could equally express the satisfaction he must get from all this manipulation of the innocent?

Believing him is a grave mistake. Disbelieving him is an even greater one. His critics are just as much fools as his supporters. His defence? "I don't exist". Yet stupidly people buy into him both for and against. WAKE UP !!!!!

Drum Thunder !!! · 2012-10-09 02:35:10

I know it's terrible, I even had the party whip onto me.

Taylor McIntyre · 2012-10-09 03:50:12

More:

"And yet you too are engaging with him by this discourse (as am I). This is my point, the man tells you he is a liar and yet you are basing all your analysis on his lies. You have been dragged down the rabbit hole too. What I can't understand is how he does this. He has no charisma. He presents himself as loathsome and quickly lives up to that description, yet you are all talking about him which is clearly what he wants. And I would still maintain that you are all talking about nothing. His "I don't exist" defence is the most mocking thing of all. I do not believe a word he says and all this analysis of him is ridiculous. He is a character of fiction. "

Taylor McIntyre · 2012-10-09 04:01:52

Pfffffft !

Taylor McIntyre · 2012-10-09 04:03:54

Got Marky Mark talking though...

fxh · 2012-10-09 07:37:46

Case dismissed - how can the case be before the court when no identity has been established - as Milord/miword has already conceded.

And theres no body.

All hearsay and not admissible.

GIZhou007 · 2012-10-09 10:03:27

Just as I start my research on Ivy Style in Shanghai and the Straits Settlements in the 1920s and 30s. Where East meets West so to say. A lot of unstructured natural shouldered jackets there.

4F Hepcat · 2012-10-09 11:16:52

fxh wrote:
Case dismissed

Don't tell me, Russell was in his working clothes......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABwDWwYX0Q4

Yuca · 2012-10-09 12:05:55

Mark Miwords wrote:
Street is a serial offender, I have even compared him to a serial killer in the past. His behaviour patterns are set and inflexible. Witness the following:

1. Trad. He encourages the trusting into fantasy and then mocks them.

2. Talk Ivy. See above.

3. Ivy Style. See above.

It's the same thing over and over again and new people keep on falling for it. Perverse is the only adjective which truly sums up Russell Street. What other word could equally express the satisfaction he must get from all this manipulation of the innocent?

Believing him is a grave mistake. Disbelieving him is an even greater one. His critics are just as much fools as his supporters. His defence? "I don't exist". Yet stupidly people buy into him both for and against. WAKE UP !!!!!

I still don't get what Jim's guilty of. He was largely responsible for turning me from someone with no knowledge of ivy clothing into a diehard ivy fan; what's the problem? He insults Chens repeatedly (some would say fixatedly). Nothing to approve of (although Chens does ask for it), but it hardly makes him a genius Bond villain.

And either believing or disbelieving him is a grave mistake? You've really lost me there I'm afraid.

Btw, Jim stopped calling himself R Street some time ago. Try to keep up.

Or are you another one of Jim's alter egos? (It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.)

steve mcqueen fan · 2012-10-09 12:38:43

Yuca wrote:
Mark Miwords wrote:
Street is a serial offender, I have even compared him to a serial killer in the past. His behaviour patterns are set and inflexible. Witness the following:

1. Trad. He encourages the trusting into fantasy and then mocks them.

2. Talk Ivy. See above.

3. Ivy Style. See above.

It's the same thing over and over again and new people keep on falling for it. Perverse is the only adjective which truly sums up Russell Street. What other word could equally express the satisfaction he must get from all this manipulation of the innocent?

Believing him is a grave mistake. Disbelieving him is an even greater one. His critics are just as much fools as his supporters. His defence? "I don't exist". Yet stupidly people buy into him both for and against. WAKE UP !!!!!
Or are you another one of Jim's alter egos? (It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.)

This thread in a nutshell , no pun intended. Jim speaks with Mark. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4zP7247W7o

4F Hepcat · 2012-10-09 12:46:11

^Exactly!

Liam Mac · 2012-10-09 12:51:18

Spot on. I'm sure Jim would be over the moon with that comparison too.

...Mark won't like it one bit.

Last edited by Liam Mac (2012-10-09 13:56:08)

Armchaired · 2012-10-09 13:21:19

It’s hard not to absolutely love the guy (Jim) really.
He is an absolute legend but clearly completely bonkers.
Which endears him too me even more.

Drum Thunder !!! · 2012-10-09 13:23:09

I love that film, and Take the Money and Run, after that things just got a bit less stupid...

steve mcqueen fan · 2012-10-09 13:29:59

Armchaired wrote:
It’s hard not to absolutely love the guy (Jim) really.
He is an absolute legend but clearly completely bonkers.
Which endears him too me even more.

We smokemed peace pipe recently, I hope he takes my joke as it was intended.

Armchaired · 2012-10-09 13:38:04

^^
Hopefully
He built this playground for us kids.
He shouldn't get angry if we go a bit crazy on the swings.

Taylor McIntyre · 2012-10-09 17:06:30

Oy.... What's a person to think ?

Mark in his stating of the bleedin' obvious as if it's some kind of a bolt from the blue is an even bigger moron than Chens & Geddes.

'Russell' - And I was only ever one quarter of that original writing/drinking team - is only a debating point.

Today he is written by aniother man in anither country for whom I have the highest respect.

... And as for me...

Don't let on, Mark - But I exist !

My Mates know me. You never will.

#1 2012-10-09 02:27:14

The case against Russell Street

#2 2012-10-09 02:35:10

Re: The case against Russell Street

#3 2012-10-09 03:50:12

Re: The case against Russell Street

#4 2012-10-09 04:01:52

Re: The case against Russell Street

#5 2012-10-09 04:03:54

Re: The case against Russell Street

#6 2012-10-09 07:37:46

Re: The case against Russell Street

#7 2012-10-09 10:03:27

Re: The case against Russell Street

#8 2012-10-09 11:16:52

Re: The case against Russell Street

fxh wrote:

#9 2012-10-09 12:05:55

Re: The case against Russell Street

Mark Miwords wrote:

#10 2012-10-09 12:38:43

Re: The case against Russell Street

Yuca wrote:

Mark Miwords wrote:

#11 2012-10-09 12:46:11

Re: The case against Russell Street

#12 2012-10-09 12:51:18

Re: The case against Russell Street

#13 2012-10-09 13:21:19

Re: The case against Russell Street

#14 2012-10-09 13:23:09

Re: The case against Russell Street

#15 2012-10-09 13:29:59

Re: The case against Russell Street

Armchaired wrote:

#16 2012-10-09 13:38:04

Re: The case against Russell Street

#17 2012-10-09 17:06:30

Re: The case against Russell Street

Board footer