I think "have / has it out for" is the same as "had it in for", as in someone is relentlessly pursuing you with the intent of doing harm. Maybe like the police having a warrant out for someone's arrest?
You could also "have it out with" someone to mean to argue with them. "I really was in no mood to have it out with Jack Armstrong."
Tell us how you really feel AC.
Well played.
The house that hemp built... bring it Sammy!
I prefer to not always use correct standard English. I like throwing in slang and the occasional colloquialism when just farting around on a clothing forum, especially in the NSFW category. It's not like I'm writing a thesis here. And in fact, I can't recall the last time I heard someone say "have it in for" or "have it out for". Sorry if I misspoke. JEEEEZZZ. I'm from Georgia. Remember? I thought the fact that I know the difference between i.e. and e.g. was cause for immense pride.
Last edited by Worried Man (2013-08-18 18:15:40)
... And I can't help being glad that I don't have an 8 year old daughter...
BUT THAT'S NOT THE POINT !!!!!!
A bad man said a bad thing and should pay.
A good man stood up for her - My Brother.
The Internet is a world of words - The intention was to menace a child here, whether real or just an online construct.
The reality of the child makes no difference: A BAD MAN expressed a desire to be BAD to a child and another BAD MAN congratulated him on it.
These are the FACTS.
M'Lud, I rest my ass.
... TAKE HIM AWAY !!!!
^^I think Shooey wrote these last two posts.
You can always tell when Jim gets riled, he has an entire conversation with himself.
He's not really riled. He just wants you to think he's riled. This is when his snarketing is most viral. Be careful and also watch out.
Such a tricky guy.
I can only agree. Bravo.
... And it does encapsulate the Internet / world of computers rather well: Nobody done nothing to no one and yet that fact is now on a criminal database.
Really, Goodfella' trolling (He does exist, but just not recently!) has made him guilty of thoughtcrime or crimethink. Ditto Chens. They are both guilty of expressing BAD thoughts.
BRING BACK THE CAT !!!!!
'Angin's too good for 'em.
Not as funny sounding though, is it ?
- Important to stress that none of this is anything to do with me. Blame my Brother. In fact, ban him from the forum. All this FBI malarkey is entirely down to him. I merely told the tale to him over dinner one night...
Back to you, Sammy - You have, by your own admission, impersonated the child threatener Goodfella and blackened his name online - He only menaced children before you started pretending to be him. Under your rule 'he' also professed a sexual interest in my wife (46).
You owe Goodfella a full public apology for suggesting that the post pubescent are of any remote interest to him.
Shame on you, Sammy. You have compromised the good standing of a creepy creep. Probably none of the other fat, depressive, whack jobs in San Francisco are talking to him any more.
He should sue you.
For the record, I would like to stand up for Dan Goodfella. I don't believe for one minute that adult women are any part of his world. We may not agree with his disgusting choices but we must let Dan be Dan and not misrepresent him.
Bad Sammy. Bad.
x