Vaclav wrote:
Horace wrote:
I'm pleased to note that our old friend Skip from AA&AAC has taken note of this thread and repeated some of what's gleaned from it, there.
It's sad they cannot post a link inside.
Perhaps someday they will be free?
Horace wrote:
And more often than not, I'll take the pocket. Even on bespoke.
Horace, I'll see your flapped pocket, and raise you one.
All of my BD collar shirts have two flapped pockets. I've always like the look. Years ago, I ordered epaulets as well. I don't wear a BD with a suit very often, mostly with a sport coat sans tie(Agnelli style).
Tomasso wrote:
Horace wrote:
And more often than not, I'll take the pocket. Even on bespoke.
Horace, I'll see your flapped pocket, and raise you one.
All of my BD collar shirts have two flapped pockets. I've always like the look. Years ago, I ordered epaulets as well. I don't wear a BD with a suit very often, mostly with a sport coat sans tie(Agnelli style).
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e141/ … oes037.jpg
It was always natural for the Brooks Brothers man, and I imagine still is, to wear a BB BD oxford blue shirt with a BB suit, from grey flannel to khaki poplin.
Epaulets on shirts would be much more ideal for hot climates where jackets aren't neccesarily required. Perhaps the African continent.
Marc Grayson wrote:
Tomasso wrote:
Horace wrote:
And more often than not, I'll take the pocket. Even on bespoke.
Horace, I'll see your flapped pocket, and raise you one.
All of my BD collar shirts have two flapped pockets. I've always like the look. Years ago, I ordered epaulets as well. I don't wear a BD with a suit very often, mostly with a sport coat sans tie(Agnelli style).
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e141/ … oes037.jpgIt was always natural for the Brooks Brothers man, and I imagine still is, to wear a BB BD oxford blue shirt with a BB suit, from grey flannel to khaki poplin.
Followed by white, I'd assume.
Speaking of Brooks and of double pockets:
from '52:
'
excepting the collar points (which I think are a tad too short for my tastes, and the fact that it's made of dacron!), I like the "fit" of this full cut, traditional fit shirt. Maybe something with higher armholes would be to others' taste. 
This above ad, c. '53, also perhaps belies the assertions made in an old thread I participated in on the influence between Italian and American Ivy Styles and in an older thread on French noir cinema & the style of Alain Delon on SF that the short, "stubby" BD collar is a Continental "invention" (as it was either suggested or directly stated -- I don't recall which).
Here's a last one, from Sulka, c. 53:
Last edited by Horace (2006-05-25 03:56:11)
Here's a few more.
A Paul Stuart with cloth from Denmark, c. Winter 1954:
(I wonder if you can still get cloth from Denmark? I know they still do excellent woven stuff -- sweaters, caps, socks, fine hosiery, etc.) There's a store in Paris -- the name I don't remember -- that has much good Danish stuff. By the Scottish boutique.
Some Brooks "polo" shirts, c. Aut. 1953. You'll recall that Allen Solly used to make good quality stuff. I don't know if they still do. Pollock had something to say about them, in a post previous, on the other forums.
Rogers Peet, Winter 1953. I really like the roll to this collar. This price (US$3.95) is about 1/2 price of what a Brooks shirt was at this time, I think.
Last edited by Horace (2006-06-01 06:39:59)
Here's one from Arrow Shirts. I've just thrown it into the Trad thread for the hell of it. Whether there be a thing such as Trad before the 50's, I'm still on the fence about. I like the way the trousers fit on the natural wait. And contra Manton, these are reserve pleated, without braces.
c. Dec. '42:
I have to get on the record and submit my thoughts on this. I sincerely think that button down shirts and double cuffs are wrong. Button down shirts are an excellent choice in casual shirting. Double cuff shirts are an excellent choice in more formal shirts. When you combine both of these elements, you get, IMHO, mush. IE, a shirt that is neither casual or formal.
IMHO, this type of shirt is the sartorial equivalent of a DB coat with notch lapels...................
Last edited by cuffthis (2006-06-08 08:54:37)
Tomasso,
I've been thinking about getting a BD with double pockets but wasn't sure how it'd look. Your photo has me convinced to try it.
Cuffthis,
I think you're absolutely right. After seeing a well-dressed guy in a tab collar shirt with French cuffs that looked rally great, I've come to consider that perfectly acceptable as well (in addition to a spread collar).
cuffthis wrote:
I sincerely think that button down shirts and double cuffs are wrong.
They have their devotees.
I loved that button-down round collar in that 1952 ad.
Jay Gatsby
cuffthis wrote:
I have to get on the record and submit my thoughts on this. I sincerely think that button down shirts and double cuffs are wrong.
I tend to agree with you, though I think the Cary Grant example looks swell (but when is Grant not a good example, eh?).
Button down shirts are an excellent choice in casual shirting.
I know that they're inherently less formal than other collar styled shirts, but I would probably rank a little less casual than you would.
IMHO, this type of shirt is the sartorial equivalent of a DB coat with notch lapels...................
Just a guess, but I bet we could find examples of DB coats with notched lapels that were fashionable & respectable "back in the day", as the kids like to say.
Tomasso wrote:
cuffthis wrote:
I sincerely think that button down shirts and double cuffs are wrong.
They have their devotees.
I suppose you can't tell from the picture, but I wonder if that's a one-sided link. (or a bar type double-link). It'd be great if it were one-sided.
Horace, have you run into any ads for Middishade Clothing ? Have you any info on the company? They were based in Philadelphia.
Tomasso wrote:
Horace, have you run into any ads for Middishade Clothing ? Have you any info on the company? They were based in Philadelphia.
No but I'll keep a look out. Were they a suit or shirt company? There were something like over 40 shirt factories in Philly at one time, according to this guy I was talking to that's still in the rag trade.
Horace wrote:
Tomasso wrote:
Horace, have you run into any ads for Middishade Clothing ? Have you any info on the company? They were based in Philadelphia.
No but I'll keep a look out. Were they a suit or shirt company? There were something like over 40 shirt factories in Philly at one time, according to this guy I was talking to that's still in the rag trade.
I believe that they were primarily a suit maker that supplied haberdashers in the Midwest and Eastern U.S. Here's an example of their work from a thread at the Fedora Lounge. Looks to be a high quality suit.
http://thefedoralounge.com/showthread.php?t=7349
THanks for the pic. I'll keep a look out. I did notice, in older publications, many more suitmakers from Philadelphia. Gordon was one. I don't recall if GGG was the same as Gordon or another name entirely.
Here's a flap pocket shirt with what appears to be a tennis collar. There was some speculation on when the modern flap pocket shirt first came into being. This illustration, at least, places the flap pocket shirt firmly in sport.
circa, Fall 1934
Last edited by Horace (2006-06-19 23:23:32)
Interesting size & placement of that flapped pocket - It looks lower down the shirt body and larger than I've seen before. Or is that just me?
Miles Away wrote:
Interesting size & placement of that flapped pocket - It looks lower down the shirt body and larger than I've seen before. Or is that just me?
No, it certainly looks that way. But I wonder if it isn't an illusion created by the trousers being worn higher on the waist?
Golden Arrow shirts, Winter '53:
Note too, the gorge on this jacket. Some would claim that this gorge is too low; I think it looks fine. Though granted it is an illustration and the figure is sitting.
Here's one from New Haven's Fenn-Feinstein, c. 54.
I like that club collar. Note the selection of shirts here.
I'll type in the copy if anyone has problems reading it.
Horace wrote:
Miles Away wrote:
Interesting size & placement of that flapped pocket - It looks lower down the shirt body and larger than I've seen before. Or is that just me?
No, it certainly looks that way. But I wonder if it isn't an illusion created by the trousers being worn higher on the waist?
Could well be - Good point.