I thought it might be fun to see how much vomit these induce over here:

Alden longwings on the Plaza last, with single soles.
Chum,
What is the prob? I will take if you do not want. The toe looks a bit un kosher,, but so be it.
Cheerio.
Quite nice, no? Or is the joke that we are all supposed to drool on keyboards in a fit of Alden-envy?
No, I like them a lot. But they are on the Plaza last, instead of the Barrie last, and come with single soles instead of double. I thought some traditionalists might be annoyed. Oh well.
Last edited by mafoofan (2009-01-23 12:08:14)
Beauties.
I have some old single soled Florsheim longwings, and I love 'em.
mafoofan wrote:
No, I like them a lot. But they are on the Plaza last, instead of the Barrie last, and come with single soles instead of double. I thought some traditionalists might be annoyed. Oh well.
No need for that. Quite nice (and I did drool a little).
Look fine to me.
Those have a far better shape than the normal Alden Barrie last version, much sleeker and longer, which is appropriate for this type of shoo. But the single soles are a mistake (throws off the balance) and cordovan is always unforgiveably hideous in appearance. They are neither fish nor fowl. This type of shoo only looks good with double (or triple) soles, and in brown calf. They are country shoos, country shoos.
These ones look likek the sort of novelty items I have come to expect from the Hawaiian Shoo Seller, i.e. from the "what if" category of "Let's try this! It will be super awesome!". Highly imaginative stuff, which does not work in real life. Designer nonsense. The classics are classics for a reason. Mess with them at your peril. Leave the messing around with classics to Japanese designers and their gay clientele from Nolita, NY (or wherever).
You have the good taste to go to Raphaell for your suits, why buy hideous American RTW shoos, which are neither fish-nor-fowl, and don't know their owner wants them to be?
Those are dead ringers for the Brooks Brothers Cordovans I bought (with employee discount) in 1985. I still have them and trust me - - they only get better. Although, 20 years from now AAAC will be debating whether cordovan flip flops are Trad. The key to these is to polish them every other time with black polish. This was done my Brooks salesmen I worked with and it gave the cord a patina - - a lived in look long before they were lived in. Something between black and cord and consequently quite beautiful. The single sole enables a pairing with a suit. That's what they were made for.
By the way, shortly after purchasing mine, I was in the Irish Pub in Philadelphia circa 1985 when the cutest little brunnet said to me, "You can always tell a lot about a man by his shoes and his watch. I like your shoes."
Last edited by tintin (2009-01-23 15:08:22)
tintin wrote:
The single sole enables a pairing with a suit. That's what they were made for.
I have seen longwings with a single goodyear welted sole. They look fine.
But these ones have the reversed extra strip of leather (welt), which adds too much visual weight and needs the extra sole to balance it out. See the Vass book on shoemaking. I think he calls this double-stitching. Anyway, they are not for dress shoes (i.e. with suits).
I see all your points Tony, but tell me - what's up with the shoulders in your avatar? They look a bit, rigid.
Tony Ventresca wrote:
Those have a far better shape than the normal Alden Barrie last version, much sleeker and longer, which is appropriate for this type of shoo. But the single soles are a mistake (throws off the balance)
I agree that the Plaza version is nice; I disagree with you about the single sole. In this case, I think the Alden longwing looks sleek with the single sole.
Horace wrote:
Tony Ventresca wrote:
Those have a far better shape than the normal Alden Barrie last version, much sleeker and longer, which is appropriate for this type of shoo. But the single soles are a mistake (throws off the balance)
I agree that the Plaza version is nice; I disagree with you about the single sole. In this case, I think the Alden longwing looks sleek with the single sole.
But with the 360 extended welt and double stitched welt? It's like putting skinny snow tires on a Corvette.
I dont like them, mainly because the balance seems off. There is alot of bulk and busy-ness on the uppers of a pair of longwings. The barrie last and double soles seem to complement the upper bulk, whereas the sleeker plaza last and single sole seem to fight it. I think you mentioned in another post that the reason you prefer Alden over AE is because AE often makes their shoes too generic and international looking. It seems ironic to me that you have done just that with these shoes. The charm of the Alden longwing IS the bulky last and double soles. When you change those things, you effectively lose the charm they have.
All I want to know is who trod on Maffy's toes?
Tony Ventresca wrote:
Horace wrote:
Tony Ventresca wrote:
Those have a far better shape than the normal Alden Barrie last version, much sleeker and longer, which is appropriate for this type of shoo. But the single soles are a mistake (throws off the balance)
I agree that the Plaza version is nice; I disagree with you about the single sole. In this case, I think the Alden longwing looks sleek with the single sole.
But with the 360 extended welt and double stitched welt? It's like putting skinny snow tires on a Corvette.
Alright, 'aving 'ad a 2nd look I think you've a point. I don't know.
Mafoofan:
Not a fan of the toe shape (slightly squared off) at all. Not a fan of the single sole at all; why did you cut it's dick off for? lt seems like a real mixed up shoo.
Still.....l admire you for your love of Longwings. Even if you got 5 pairs of identicle longwings and got bored with them down the track, it's no big deal. You can always buy more shoos if you tire of them. But don't be too sure of yourself: l wore nothing but the plainest shoos for 12 years and hated any broguing or decoration. You're a young man and tastes can change, especially when you are only beginning to develop a style.
One thing l do like is how you will mismatch shoos to an outfit. lt's slightly eccentric and shows a `l don't give a damn, i'm confident' attitude. lt's a real personal style trait.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2009-01-25 21:05:58)
The_Shooman wrote:
Mafoofan:
Not a fan of the single sole at all; why did you cut it's dick off for?
heh, that's funny...I said the exact same thing on Style Forum
anyways, it's not a terrible shoe, but I agree with the sentiments about the aesthetic of the shoe not being in synch with the sole-welt-last-etc. Actually the last is ok, I have a pair of Plaza last Aldens that are nice, and it's probably their most "elegant" last, tho I prefer the Barrie for a brogue
Here's what I meant, by saying that if longwings have a single sole then they should be normal goodwear welted, like the ones below (and not the double stitched, 360 degree extra welt versions as per MFan's).![]()
![]()
(Thanks to Doc for the photos, ask and ye shall receive!)
Tony Ventresca wrote:
Here's what I meant, by saying that if longwings have a single sole then they should be normal goodwear welted, like the ones below (and not the double stitched, 360 degree extra welt versions as per MFan's).
http://www.filmnoirbuff.com/forum/uploa … 9_c207.jpghttp://www.filmnoirbuff.com/forum/uploa … 9_b208.jpg
(Thanks to Doc for the photos, ask and ye shall receive!)
I think the reverse welt makes the side of the shoe look less broad-sided and pleasingly parallel the the all-around broguing. The version you show looks like it isn't finished.
Last edited by mafoofan (2009-02-04 14:53:00)
mafoofan wrote:
Tony Ventresca wrote:
Here's what I meant, by saying that if longwings have a single sole then they should be normal goodwear welted, like the ones below (and not the double stitched, 360 degree extra welt versions as per MFan's).
http://www.filmnoirbuff.com/forum/uploa … 9_c207.jpghttp://www.filmnoirbuff.com/forum/uploa … 9_b208.jpg
(Thanks to Doc for the photos, ask and ye shall receive!)I think the reverse welt makes the side of the shoe look less broad-sided and pleasingly parallel the the all-around broguing. The version you show looks like it isn't finished.
I think you're wrong, but we can aregue this forever. If you're happy with your shoos, then I'm happy for you. I would never get them however, for the reasons I stated. Remember, that most of what we post is for that huge number of readers who lurk on forums but never post.
Very nice shoes Mafoo, I'd wear those in a heartbeat.
Tony Ventresca wrote:
Remember, that most of what we post is for that huge number of readers who lurk on forums but never post.
Aye.
Russell_Street wrote:
Tony Ventresca wrote:
Remember, that most of what we post is for that huge number of readers who lurk on forums but never post.
Aye.
I can only hope I have presented some coherent thoughts that will discourage some youngster from wasting his money on similar shoos.