Donald Thomas wrote an excellent book on the period. I knew a little about the case in question. Forsythe was hanged.
As Aljazz has said we both grew up in NW London.
I turned 15 and left school at Christmas 1961. Started work as an apprentice printer in Feb '62 and took the mod route from there. Used to go to the State Ballroom in Kilburn and the Ritz at Kingsbury both dancehalls that were popular with mods. As far as I know the styles originated in central London in places like Lyceum and gradually spread out to the suburban dancehalls. This was before there was any interest in the press and well before RSG.
Simon: You are wrong about Jeff Dexter, he is absolutely NOT gay, in fact he has been married for many years and has two grown-up sons.
Chris - how much ivy can you remember being sported by original mods? I get the impression that US button downs, loafers, Harringtons and madras were part of the mod look, but ivy staples such as 3-2 roll sack jackets, flannel suits and chinos were not seen on mods.
Yuca, that's just because not all sack jackets were typical 3/2 rolls, I have some very high 3 button sacks and some "tipped" rolls.... and you can also wear a 3/2 as a 3 button, which is what many people in the UK in the 60s did...
A continuing Italian influence, perhaps?
I might be wrong, but I should have thought the jackets we favour now were fairly slow to catch on with the pop fraternity. They were trying to look sexy.
In fact, I don't think the asexual nature of much Ivy dressing - or, at least, the principles behind it - is stressed often enough. Forget McQueen or Robert Culp in 'I-Spy' for a while; think laterally instead. It's a look of multiple contradictions - which is what makes it so fascinating.
Ivy is asexual? Not my perception. Doesn't the fact that ivy was so popular with Hollywood stars contradict that? Hollywood stars are known for their sex appeal as much as their acting, and that has been the case since before the boom years period. I can't imagine many boom years actors would have been willing to put their sex appeal at risk (nor would the average student or average male under a certain age for that matter).
Not talking about its 'adoption'. Talking about its development amongst the US WASP types.
I agree though, ivy did not suit UK pop stars - too conservative and subtle, not swinging enough. Also, by the mid 60s it must have been apparent that ivy's dominance was nearing its end, and no one in the entertainment industry wants to look behind the times. (Hence the universal late 60s dropping of ivy by jazz musicians, who had enough problems trying to earn a living without looking painfully out of fashion.)
Let's put it that way:
Ivy League clothing does not accentuate or emphasize secondary male sexual characteristics such as broad shoulders.
Maybe we can agree on that.
Yes. Written evidence suggests that Ivy worn as a badge gave off non-threatening signals.
You only have to read 'The Catcher In The Rye' to get at least a whiff of this.
Last edited by Yuca (2011-11-06 04:17:55)
You can also refer back to Gibson Gardens' own writings on the subject. You can't, in a sense, get much more contemporary than that. 'The Look', for them, was of primary importance. Not the mating instinct. A sack jacket conceals the male torso. Wide wale cords hardly scream libido.
In the thread on the Stanley Blacker blazer, yes...