"J. Press sells an American look inspired by the company's Ivy League heritage.
However, it differs from original Ivy League in many important ways.
What we now sell is a more contemporary presentation including a shoulder line which most will be more familiar with."
- Not a hope in hell I'll ever tell you who said that !
Chin up, America - You still have Zach.
There are still some good items in their range, staple garments that they have been selling since the boom years, but overall most of it is not much better than what Brooks Brothers are offering.
God help us if Zach's time machine breaks down.
woofboxer wrote:
There are still some good items in their range, staple garments that they have been selling since the boom years, but overall most of it is not much better than what Brooks Brothers are offering.
I hate to impose on you... Could I ask you for your pick of the current best ?
At your leisure & purely for fun.
Best -
Liam Mac wrote:
God help us if Zach's time machine breaks down.
He's the Ivy Doctor Who.
J Press in Cambridge is my favourite clothes shop in the world that I have visited. I haven't visited The Suit Room yet.
Give my regards to Denis Black... And then to Charlie a short stroll on.
A comment on Mr. Chensvold's blog on this topic got deleted by him today, I am informed. Which is hardly news.
The 'Updated American' shouulder is a reality - Only just a tad softer than a European one and a marketing reality for ex-Ivy League clothiers like Brooks & Press. Brooks in fact did this shoulder first. Delete this (old) news all you wish, Christian. Too busy trying to curry fabour with Press, or just not that much of an industry insider afterall ?
The shoulder is just a slightly softer version of the European standard & not a Natural Shoulder by choice to try to shift more units.
- In a way this is actually good news: I've been saying they've been getting the shoulder 'wrong' for years... Now I know they just aren't even trying to do Natural Shoulders anymore anyway.
Which was obvious. It's just nice to have it confirmed.
- This news online here first, BTW.
Quite a stink over this.
Can't see why.
I'm rather proud of certain guys at J. Press for saying that they know better than the product that they are currently expected to sell as J. Press salesmen.
In my book they are the REAL J. Press loyalists.
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
- I would try to have the same conversations at Brooks, but who is there still left there who feels as strongly about classic American style ?
My son is in Hanoi and having a suit made with several fittings. He followed my advice - SOFT shoulders - otherwise his shoulders will look like the Hulk's.
The 110th anniversary silk heritage three patch 3/2 sportscoat on their website looks absolutely slayin imo.
Jimbo wrote:
woofboxer wrote:
There are still some good items in their range, staple garments that they have been selling since the boom years, but overall most of it is not much better than what Brooks Brothers are offering.
I hate to impose on you... Could I ask you for your pick of the current best ?
At your leisure & purely for fun.
Best -
They've always had great sweaters. You can still buy most of the accessoires such as ties and belts, etc....
Decent outerwear...
Shirts are fine, but I'd prefer Brooks. Then again, I'd prefer Brooks shirts over Press shirts from 30 years or 50 years back, too...
Regarding tailored clothing, in my experience, their best stuff currently is either to be found in the very expensive Pressidential line or (if you want to file this under "tailored") in the very cheap casual category, like their unlined ("slack") jackets which are similar (or even identical?) to J.Keydge's Ivy model...
J.Press today might not be much better than Brooks today, yes, but as far as I know or as far as I understand it, they kept a rather traditional style, still offering mainly undarted sack jackets and all the other Ivy classics, when Brooks Brothers became pretty faceless/ mainstream/ Euro during the 90s.
J. Keydge do indeed supply J. Press.
Even in the Pressidential line, though, the shoulder line looks rather square and padded...compared to their older stuff:
1.
a current J.Press sportscoat in their Pressidential line (from the website)
2.
an older Press jacket (a San Francisco era jacket, from our For Sale thread)
... but this might as well be all about the presentation, whatever... The top one is on a dummy, the bottom jacket on a hanger, so I'm not sure if my impression is correct.
However, from experience, I'd say that the contemporary Press shoulder line, even in the undarted models is indeed more like the shoulder of an updated American jacket than like the shoulder line of their old Ivy sacks...
The casual jackets are pretty cool, though:
I have yet to see stuff from their new heritage line in the flesh... I was not really excited about what I've seen so far, to be honest....
Last edited by Hard Bop Hank (2012-05-21 04:01:39)
Jimbo wrote:
J. Keydge do indeed supply J. Press.
The buttons look the same. They don't mention anything about this on their page, but why would they?
I only know for sure because they have a habit of sending out group emails without hiding the other recipients.
Another famous quote from J. Press off the record is that their jackets "look like they have wings".
But a recent visitor to NYC said that everywhere was just as bad. He only praised a very few bits by Ralph Lauren and Jack Spade in the entire (RTW) city... I checked them out & even they were shite !
Jack Spade was especially awful. Clock this little stinker:
http://www.jackspade.com/Charles-3-Butt … sportcoats
It would be interesting to learn a little more about the history of the slack jacket.
I wouldn't be surprised if J.Press had been selling unstructured/ unlined casual jackets before they were supplied by J. Keydge.
Is it an American thing, originally, or a European invention?
Chris Hardy recently had a nice Italian slack jacket in the H&J group, can't remember how old it was...
Thinking about it, I could imagine that the unlined, unstructured slack jacket might be as old as the sack.
Which, again, comes from France ca. 1840s/50s, as far as I know...
Jimbo wrote:
Another famous quote from J. Press off the record is that their jackets "look like they have wings".
But a recent visitor to NYC said that everywhere was just as bad. He only praised a very few bits by Ralph Lauren and Jack Spade in the entire (RTW) city... I checked them out & even they were shite !
Jack Spade was especially awful. Clock this little stinker:
http://www.jackspade.com/Charles-3-Butt … sportcoats
http://s7d5.scene7.com/is/image//Jacksp … 8518518519
Brrrr..... Nowhere near as good as a Keydge... Don't know Jack Spade.
The Weejun recently mentioned one of their surcingle belts (in my fave "Voice of Fire" colours). But they were out of stock, I think.
Hard Bop Hank wrote:
It would be interesting to learn a little more about the history of the slack jacket.
I wouldn't be surprised if J.Press had been selling unstructured/ unlined casual jackets before they were supplied by J. Keydge.
Is it an American thing, originally, or a European invention?
Chris Hardy recently had a nice Italian slack jacket in the H&J group, can't remember how old it was...
Thinking about it, I could imagine that the unlined, unstructured slack jacket might be as old as the sack.
Which, again, comes from France ca. 1840s/50s, as far as I know...
Your thinking is right !
Some also call them 'Artisan' jackets (Boden especially). 'Slack', I think, is Keydge's own coinage.
Jimbo wrote:
Hard Bop Hank wrote:
It would be interesting to learn a little more about the history of the slack jacket.
I wouldn't be surprised if J.Press had been selling unstructured/ unlined casual jackets before they were supplied by J. Keydge.
Is it an American thing, originally, or a European invention?
Chris Hardy recently had a nice Italian slack jacket in the H&J group, can't remember how old it was...
Thinking about it, I could imagine that the unlined, unstructured slack jacket might be as old as the sack.
Which, again, comes from France ca. 1840s/50s, as far as I know...Your thinking is right !
Isn't it interesting that our oh-so-formal business suits originally were closely related to very humble workwear garments?
Jimbo wrote:
Some also call them 'Artisan' jackets (Boden especially). 'Slack', I think, is Keydge's own coinage.
"Slack jacket" is, of course, an Americanism, a play on "slacks" (that word isn't used in British English, right?), a jacket to wear with your "slacks"...
That's why I wasn't sure at first, if they were from Keydge originally or from Press or some other American company... They're playing with the US connection, definitely, also calling one of them the Ivy model, but they might as well be aware of the sakko's/ sack jackets roots in France...
Great thread! I have to say I am rather impressed with my one micro-check shirt from modern J.Press. The ties cut the mustard too. Some vintage jacket herringbones and one I got from Woofboxer are superior to any of the vintage Brooks I have. Of course, that's not a definitive sample.
I think the good thing about this thread is that it shows that Press aren't actually doing anything 'wrong' - They just aren't doing Traditional American Style / Ivy League Style anymore / just now in the US. They are doing a Europeanised update on their heritage.
The more constructed shoulders are deliberate as are the stiffer shirt collars.
Not sure why Press as a company have been so coy about this officially. All they've done is to be criticised for no longer doing things 'properly' anymore.
They should have included in their recent rebranding an updated mission statement that said they weren't your Grandfather or Father's J. Press anymore and made that a selling point.
Brooks also made a disaster of their dropping of Traditional American style by not being explicit about it. They equally dropped the old Ivy/Trad/Whatever USP to make money. Fair enough, they are a business afterall. But the failure to say we're still Brooks, but we're not the Brooks you know and to sell that as a positive has harmed their reputation. Same with J. Press. Unless you tell people what you're actually up to so they can judge you fairly people will just find the move from American to more European styling on behalf of these brands looking them losing the plot.
So don't 'blame Canada' afterall - If Press wanted Natural Shouldered jackets and shirts with soft collar rolls they'd have them made up there. It's not the manufacturers working for these companies who have made this change, it's the companies themselves.
They just ain't doing kosher American anymore. They want to make some money instead !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOR38552MJA
Hard Bop Hank wrote:
However, from experience, I'd say that the contemporary Press shoulder line, even in the undarted models is indeed more like the shoulder of an updated American jacket than like the shoulder line of their old Ivy sacks...
I would agree with this. A couple of months ago, during a trip to NYC, I bought a 'Presstige' sports jacket in Magee Donegal Mist tweed, one of the classic Press items they still stock (reduced by 50% hurrah).
Since then I've also bought a vintage one from Chris H. The same jacket, same size, but in a different colour, so I've been able to compare the two. I'd say the jackets are pretty well identical in terms of fit and quality .... apart from the shoulder
The shoulder on the modern jacket is ever so slightly more padded than than the vintage item and a bit squarer. It doesn't seem to sit so snugly on the shoulder and have that nice rounded effect as I look down at the top of my arm. I hope this makes sense? I'm going to wear it for a while as shoulders on jackets do have to bed in and mould to your individual shape, but I may consider taking it to my tailor for his opinion in due course.
J Press have shifted production of their tailored items to Canada, I don't know how long ago, but it may explain the subtle changes in the shoulders on their jackets.