Which do you reckon is more on target?
http://american.com/archive/2007/may-june-magazine-contents/the-controversy-over-super-wool/?searchterm=wool
http://www.filmnoirbuff.com/article/the-english-and-their-city-suit-part-2
At least one English tailor is less than enthusiastic.
http://www.englishcut.com/
Manton plays on imaginary fears that men will believe their suit will dissolve if it is made from super 150 fabric. That article was way too long for the subject mater. FNB broke his up a lot more.
Does he think he will reverse the fabric trend or is it all just a hollow exercise?
Last edited by The_Shooman (2007-05-16 12:30:16)
Last edited by The_Shooman (2007-05-16 12:53:36)
WTF is "American.com"? A digital right-wing rag for the sixth- and seventh-string reactionary scribbler? I need a drink.
^ I suppose that definitively answers whether turn-ups in the City are in vogue or not.
While I believe the article was (somewhat) informative and clearly written, he interjects too many running analogies--which really have no correlative function towards wool--and suffers from the same mentality that he accuses others of--that of pedantic little factoids.
Really, it was too long though. Wool is only as interesting a subject as a page can manage; and now someone's calling it "witty"!
http://www.askandyaboutclothes.com/forum/showpost.php?p=554107&postcount=2
Last edited by Incroyable (2007-05-17 01:09:13)