I think there is enough from the expert findings on the nature of the collapse of the buildings to suggest again the offical story might not be the correct one. I dont mind pinning my opinions to the concept of science by many more learned people than myself.

I find it strange so many professionals and professors would come forward to dispute offical findings. Why put their professional integrity on the line if they didnt feel so strongly against the offical story?

I dont suggest that there isnt a chance they could all be wrong. But when the most learned people come forward to dispute something do we listen to them. Or the politicians?  Maybe I am an idiot for not believing politicans?

The Iranians and the US are big buddies now Russ!

Bops evidence...       http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNfrMr5c6q4

Yeah if it hasnt been put into a hip hop verse it cant be true.

Like I said my speculation is due to all the professionals that have come out to question offical events specifically with all three tower collaspes. Who you going to listen to a large group of people whose business it is erecting and demolishing buildings or Donald Rumsfeld?

Last edited by Russell...Street (2014-01-10 02:10:15)

Well, there's a lot to be said for the 'realist' view, and we could certainly do with much more of it...

But there are times when interests align, that is, your allies interests are your interests. The US's protection of Europe from the Soviet threat being one such instance.