Last edited by stanshall (2016-06-27 14:50:25)
I also believe in a lot of the '70s look, although one does have to be selective. Mine tends toward the stuff that was big on campus then--which is no surprise as that's when I was on campus. Also the surfer stuff of the decade, as I was a wannabe surfer dude most of my college daze.
It sounds like you have your own pool?
I feel fortunate to live in a town with several very good pools, including a very new one at the university, but the only outdoor pool is the city pool. In general, in the summer I prefer to get my swimming done outdoors. Indoors feels wrong, artificial or something, not as much fun, anyway. Feels good to be out in the sun after some laps or even a casual dip.
Last edited by Chipper (2016-06-27 10:59:45)
/\ yes Bop
I could see doing some deep diving there.
These look good. Made in Hawaii.
http://putthison.com/post/146557180595/i-bought-a-hawaiian-shirt-despite-their-rich
Good heads up, Chief. I usually buy RJC, which are made in Oahu and are in the same price range - RJC makes affordable reverse prints shirts, too.
Two Palms and RJC are both sold at Hawaiian Shirt Dude, which also offers free shipping on every order. HSD also offers some great replicas of vintage prints that are worth checking out.
http://hawaiianshirtdude.com
/\ nice link BB to the Hawaiian Shirt Dude, thanks Chief too
No problem, Stan, glad to be of service. I'm currently doing a massive wardrobe rebuild at the moment... It's a lot of money out the door, hopefully worth it as my plan is for these clothes to last me a long time. But still, I've done a lot of research into the cheapest quality options for a lot of things, Hawaiian shirts included... These are quality, a huge variety of great classic patterns. No button-down/pullover options a la Reyn Spooner but these are the real deal, no complaints
I'm lounging in my new YR trunks. I can recommend. Sizing was a little tricky. I first went with my usual trousers size and saw much too big a muffin top for my comfort, and they felt just a little tight overall. I probably could have made them work, but I might've been a tad uncomfortable. I exchanged for the next size up, and these work--they stay up without my needing to cinch the drawstring, although they do now take on a slight bagginess. No real complaints though. Material is good and hardy, a tough nylon, and the contrasting inner lining is a nice touch. They do remind me a lot of the Hang Tens I owned in the 70s.
I wish more trunks makers added slash pockets though (these don't have them either). I find I'm constantly wanting to stuff my hands into some pockets. That's one nice feature about my Saturdays trunks.
Last edited by Chipper (2016-06-28 17:24:37)
/\ and the Birdwells I custom ordered in '12 or '13 ... great stuff, wear them almost every day ... will get more probably but am using these heavily .....
Just a heads up for everyone, there are MANY NWOT vintage Birdwells, unavailable patterns, on eBay at the moment.... Seller seattlegoodwill.... $26. I'm a 30 waist and there are quite a few, also quite a few 29s if anyone can wriggle into those...
Last edited by Chipper (2016-06-28 17:58:33)
Speaking of sizing, I learned from Birdwell that they no longer make their trunks "to the inch," i.e., they're now vanity sized like everyone else, a 34 will be a 36, etc.
This is one thing that makes finding my size, especially purchasing online, an ordeal. I also am completely flummoxed by how things fit compared to my true size. One would think that trousers or trunks that measure my true, measured waist size would fit, no? What is about how garments are cut that I need to wear a waist size that measures at least two inches smaller than my measured size in order for them to stay up and look correct.
It's a mystery to me.
I ran into sizing problems a couple years ago. I started buying a lot of new trousers etc. to replace some workhouse jeans and LLB chinos I'd been wearing previously... Suddenly I was swimming in the 32s I'd bought before. Now I'm a 30, if that... I may have lost some weight but not THAT much! Of course another problem is that many companies size trousers to sit BELOW the waist, which of course will be a LARGER measurement, so if I want to buy trousers for closer to the waist, I have to estimate how much I'll have to adjust their sizing based on where THEY are measuring... Add to that the fact there there's often no connection between, say, a Land's End 30 and an LL Bean 30, or even a 15.5 for shirts... Sad days...
It's just weird. Let's say (only for purposes of illustration) that the tape measure shows my natural waistline (which I call about an inch below my belly button) as 36 inches. If I buy a pair of trousers MEASURED at 36, i.e., the tape measure shows 18 inches across at the waist, the trousers will slide right off. The trousers will probably be marked 34. Trousers that do stay up, in fact, are those measured at 34 inches, i.e., 17 inches across. They usually will be marked 32.
I can understand vanity sizing, in that this is just the way the industry now does things. What I don't get is the difference between actual measured sizes, mine and the trousers.
It basically means that for most makers I have to size down TWO sizes to find the right fit and look. So, if my waist measures by the tape at 36, I need to buy 32.