This is shamelessly cribbed from a poster on another forum: an idea that stuck me as not without merit, considering some of the Brooks dross currently turning up on Ebay. All right, so it may not be fair to judge them on that alone but who bothers going into their shops any longer? And their shirts are turning up in TKMaxx, are they not? Same with Ralph Lauren. And the overall quality? I haven't bought anything new since 2011 - and that was only a white shirt for a wedding. It was mediocre to say the least and probably worn just the once.
Any thoughts?
I can’t speak for ‘old’ Brooks shirts. But I am on the fence about the quality of new ones vs equivalent RL, Gant etc. there’s not enough to make a difference for me. Quality and fit they’re all ok. Looks? Yes. The others can’t get that same roll. And just the name, heritage and extra detail like cuff pleats puts them on a slightly higher level doesn’t it?
To be fair I’m up to near a hundred shirts now. So really don’t have to worry about constant wash and wear issues. And I don’t know what something like a shirt would have to do to blow me away? I’d be genuinely interested to hear what puts one at the top of the Ivy tree?
I don’t think it’d be fair to compare a Brooks, Gant and RL from TKMaxx. When Gant are in they’re most likely overstock as they’re the same as in Gant stores. BB made a brief appearance immediately after it was widely reported Brooks had bitten the dust but hasn’t been seen since. RL are in there constantly. Some is ‘last season’ but an awful lot comes with the tell tail ‘made for our outlets’ tag.
All sound comment.
Near a hundred shirts? I wish I could find that amount of storage space. I might have about twenty. Never counted.
Ian Strachan rated Brooks. I came to them virtually by accident, after reading the Bosworth biography of Montgomery Clift. I've just (more less) stuck with their American made shirts.
An old Brooks shirt (a lot of Dacron) was being offered on Ebay recently. Very worn and highly unattractive. But the first I owned were in 1980.
I do think that if Brooks had designs on being the new Ralph Lauren, which if they had half a business mind someone there would have done a long time ago, they’d have a long way to go.
While they’re rightly well known and respected for their shirts, dressing Presidents and those beautiful sacks of old, I don’t tend to even read anyone on here raving about their other basic core offerings; trousers, polos, knitwear.
Like most of their offerings or not, RL are all over every item (literally, unfortunately) Whether it’s a polo shirt, bed linen or fragrance, there’s a very well oiled machine behind it to tell and sell it’s story. They’ve always managed to stay current, not resting particularly on past glories. And their perceived quality and prestige is very high indeed all around the world.
Brooks don’t need me to kick them while they’re down, but I’m afraid the average punter with average attention span, chancing across their webstore would see a very expensive Lands End or Gap. Or M&S. Which of course was half their problem.
Last edited by Spendthrift (2022-01-23 15:31:02)
Of course, that damn logo has put in an appearance.
On Brooks? Yes. And that Tiger?! They're playing to RL's strengths instead of their own. Even their wool herringbone sports coat which should be fairly untouchable and I'm sure has a great many regular loyal purchasers going back years, is modelled with the lapels turned up on floppy haired youths wearing hoodies underneath.
I would prefer a world without logos, but it clearly works for RL/Lacoste/Fred Perry etc. I never understood why groups like Matalan or Next went for it.
I'm tempted to say Brooks should have had more faith in their own product and not feel they have to stick a logo on it - But I've got a feeling they did rest on those laurels for a long time and look where that got them.
Last edited by Spendthrift (2022-01-24 04:44:48)
I don't mind a logo is positively no-one else can identify it. When wearing Ralph Lauren, for instance, it's beneath a coat or sweater.
Yes. Small one on a polo doesn't bother me. But even on a casual shirt a logo isn't welcome for me.
The Brooks Brothers sheep logo has got to be one of the worst logos.
Yes that Sheep one is terrible. Too much information and detail crammed into that tiny area.
Hardy Amies polos have good logos. Just ‘HA’ in a small diamond shape in the same colour as the shirt.
Superb quality polos for the money too.
Hard being the new Ralph.
Ralph is too big now to home in on one thing.
You want cashmere hoodies for that Billions look, you want to look like prohibition era cowboy, a Winter Olympian, the Duke of Windsor, frat boy. Ralph has it all and usually overpriced.
Sadly Ralph is a mere shadow of what it used to be.
There's always be a few pieces in an ever increasing inventory. His seersucker shorts, madras shirts, and summer brights are always worth a look. Cashmere cable knits are superb. quality. The Ivy-ish jackets are his custom fit line. Too short and tight.
Brooks hasn't the same diversity.
In fact they are reducing the number of styles/fits. No more three button/single vent jackets.No more Cordo loafers. No sumptous Terry bathrobes, No proper Shetlands. The list is endless.
I really don't anticipate seeing an outbreak of sheep in Lidl.
Actually, that's a huge exaggeration. Men wearing Ralph Lauren shirts or tops can always be counted on the finger of one hand.
I take it all back. I encountered my former next door neighbour, a money-grubbing little Tory landlord, yesterday. He was wearing a shirt with that damn pony on it. Down the street came - half-walking, half-jogging - the soft Southern shandy drinking social work manager from a few doors up. Also wearing a shirt with that damn pony. I almost went indoors to begin bagging up my Ralphie clothing for a local charity shop.
They've almost certainly never heard of Brooks Brothers.
It all seems a long way from what we're told Woody was wearing in 'Annie Hall'.
Used to go in the Brooks Brothers stores in Beverly Hills and Century City half a decade ago. Beverly Hills was large but every time I'd see something decent online they never had it in store, salesmen seemed more suited for J. Crew. Century City was much smaller but usually had a few things of interest and a knowledgable, enthusiastic, well-dressed employee.
In fact, thinking this over, I was probably spouting nonsense in the original post. Ralph Lauren shirts (in particular) still pop up in great numbers on the secondhand market. Sometimes knitwear. Even the odd coat. I saw one down our main street earlier in the year. Around the £60 mark and made in somewhere like Macao. I walked away. This is not the case with Brooks - rarely seen even in 'vintage' shops much less charity shops.