No hesitation here about Ivy, Prep and collegiate associations.
This is actually a terrific piece of viewing. Richard Press is a genial host and obviously knows his Ivy onions (as JFM might have put it). The anecdotes about Chipp are highly interesting.
One can believe that the presence of Janet Pilgrim amongst a bunch of horny young students almost caused a riot.
So where did you go to look at it?
Yes, I’m sure I’ve seen this before, I would have gone along to the FIT if it had coincided with one of our visits to NY. There was also a book about it which Chens had a hand in, like the exhibition it was heavily weighted toward the preppy end of Ivy, rowing blazers, critter pants. Spoilt to a degree by the inclusion of some bizarre modern designers interpretations of the look. Racoon coat anyone?
Apologies, all. I never have learned to post links but there are a number of interesting little films featuring Bruce Boyer, Richard Press and a rather attractive lady with dark hair on YouTube. Muffy 'Aldridge' gets a mention. Reminds me of some bod who referred to Dave Frishberg as 'Fishburn'. Must be a potential Ebay seller.
Jeez, but much of the clothing is gorgeous - but would not, I don't think, be worn by many in the UK.
Just read Woof's last post. Some truth in it, certainly. The 'Prep'/garish side would not appeal. Nantucket Reds anyone? Thought not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s78RYqwWxo for anyone too lazy to google.
Watching and listening to chaps like Richard Press provides something of a refresher course. It returns me to my early days of head to toe Ivy dressing - before I paid, perhaps, too much attention to the 'rulebook' of the English (London) Ivy scene. It gladdened my heart to hear Richard Press speak so fondly of his own Ivy League youth. Yes, there is a leaning toward the 'Preppier' end of the spectrum (as with 'Trad', what would Jimbo have said? I can well imagine), and, although the bow-tie and critter/GTH side of the style leaves me cold and gasping there remains much to be enjoyed.
It's a nice clip and Dicky Press is good on camera, employing a period vernacular charming to the British ear. But but but...that show was complete cack. Delayed in New York by that bloody hurricane in 2012 I had time to go along to FIT with my former Ivy compadre Graham Marsh. We were the only people in the rather shabby room. It had only one angle - that of the college roots. Not a smidgen on anything else. Nothing on modern jazz, nothing on the boom between 55-65, nothing on Japan, or the wider cultural influences of the style. It was very narrow, exclusively American, largely 1920s to 1940s, very white, very elitist and very fucking boring. Brooks Brothers, the originators of the language and silhouette of the Ivy Look, were virtually invisible. It was Dicky's show, lots of Press, all Ivy colleges and nothing else.
None of the above criticisms move me in the least. I enjoyed almost every second.
I agree. Dicky's great. I like his style. But a show on Ivy Style should have been much broader in focus. It was basically Dicky's memoirs turned into an exhibition and he writes and talks better than he curates. I do love however the very Jewishness of Ivy and the glorious contradiction between the marketing hype of WASP culture and the men behind the clothes all being Jewish. How very American this tension is.
^ Seconded, gladly and happily.
It was a vehicle to promote J Press and who can blame himfor that. However a bit more balance would have leant it more credibility.
A bit more balance amounting to - what? 'Gosh, look at what our English cousins have achieved'? There's a mention of whoever owns Drakes elsewhere, if that means anything. Whilst being seriously amused at the fact elite WASPishness has always been backed, schmutter-wise, by shrewd Jews (about on the same level for me as Woody Allen's celebrated 'Moose' sketch) I do not (or not always or sufficiently) give a flying fuck about any jazz connection, modern or otherwise, when it comes right down to it. That side of it is largely a fanciful 'construct'. Nothing wrong with that of course - but that's what it is. I'm fairly sure Yuca pointed out the number of jazz musicians clothed in Ivy League on a regular basis was relatively small.
As for the democratic, 'Ivy For Everyone' schtick once preached by Frosty Mellor, I'm as unconvinced now as I was at the beginning.
I want to know when JS will start selling the 'Beer suit' ....
^ Haha - I never spill a drop!
AFS - As for the democratic, 'Ivy For Everyone' schtick once preached by Frosty Mellor, I'm as unconvinced now as I was at the beginning.
For a period in the 50s and 60s the Ivy look went mainstream in American menswear and wasn’t just to be found in Brooks and J Press. The amount of it that has come up for sale on ebay and other outlets is evidence of that. JS speaks of every town having a ‘three button shop’ and his slogan ‘Natural Shoulder spoken here’ was nicked from a sign outside such a shop. So for a while when John Doe went along to his local menswear store for a new suit he was liable to walk out in a three button, natural shoulder one. To normal men a suit is just a suit and it doesn’t hold any hidden meanings about democracy or elitism. It’s just what was selling at the time.
I must admit I was late in discovering Press.
My New York trips would focus on Ralph's Rhinleander Mansion followed by Saks, Bloomies and Century 21 for bargains.
346 was OK but pretty badly merchandised. A bit soul-less.Lots and lots of the same thing. Big price tickets on tables. Very uninspiring.
When I finally discovered Press it was a bit like Dunn and Co in the UK. Much later on they opened a small store in Soho that was great. Interesting merchandise, creatively presented. I didn't last that long.
The current New York store is superb. Wish it was larger though. It's pretty modern with the merchandise very neatly presented. Surprisingly, compared to the previous store I thought they have more on display.
Alden, Brooks and kamakura were all very close one anther but now sadly Kamakura and Brooks are gone.
I've read a fair amount about the clothing styles worn by modern jazz musicians during a certain period (I wouldn't want to give dates I don't think: they would - or can be - be open to debate) and 'conservative' is the word that often crops up: especially (going out on a limb here) amongst certain players and their hip fans. 'Ivy League' is, I feel, sometimes used in a mildly derogatory sense - i.e. the style that maybe a Mulligan or Brubeck wore. It sounds as though young black males latched onto this 'conservative' way of dressing during the Truman period, perhaps as an ironic statement.
I love the idea that Mingus returned from England dressed like a Whitehall pen-pusher. Was he taking the piss?
It's so boring how the same nonsense is being claimed here over and over again. This whole business with jazz and the democratization of Ivy is a very strange historical distortion, which is mainly cultivated in Great Britain. There, however, the reference to Ivy comes from the subculture area and thus had its own origin.
Yes, there was a period when Ivy was mainstream marketed in the US. That doesn't change the fact that Ivy has never been inclusive, and never will be. On the contrary, it has always been elitist and always will be.
This has to do with the fact that it is not just a matter of clothing but of a lifestyle that is based on certain values and cannot be represented without a certain income. Ivy is (or was) the dress style of a very specific socioeconomic group. Of course, anyone can live by the values of this group, dress accordingly, and work towards achieving social status.
Last edited by Skipper (2022-05-31 03:13:16)
I'm afraid - and I'll probably be slated for this - that I don't believe for a minute it can or should be 'inclusive'. Where would be the point? Some aspects of life are for the discerning, some are not. That's why many on here prefer Mingus to Mantovani.
Much of what was said on 'Talk Ivy' in its early years was simply Frosty living out his public school hipster fantasies, poor chap. He hung around with a few people he saw as 'cool' and spun a thick web of self-deceit that led to much trouble and strife.