I got it... I got it... I got it...
I ain't got it...
... Quite the thread, eh?
Gotta love the forum format!
This is turning into one HELL of a thread and a smile has spread accross my face for the first time today. Respect! to you all. There are more identities going on here than in a re-run of "Invasion of the Bodysnatchers". Pretty soon I'm going to have to confess to actually being 'Adam', 'Cheeky Monkey', 'Patrick' and Uncle Jim himself!
And to my good friend OTP, strong drink will always coax me into revealing secrets - if indeed secrets they may be!
Staceyboy
So who were "Protagoniste"? "Taung Child"? "A Renfrewshire Arsehole" and "I Heart Harvard"?
Last edited by Shelly Hamilton (2009-07-22 17:01:09)
The whole thing should be consigned to the dustbin of history. It was worthless. Oh, maybe it meant something in London but it was of questionable value elsewhere.
/\ someone tell those two bully's to leave Brownshoe alone
^It's the only way to get him to reveal his thrifting sources.
Rarely can the innocent posting of a vintage ad have raised such a shit storm. It's been like Gorbals Mick and the Expenses Scandal all over again. Good job the 'Daily Telegraph' hasn't become embroiled.
And I love the lack of 'come back' too...
Call Chens on his schtick and he instantly folds.
Where is the brazen post by him under the name of BoO saying that he didn't write the above?
Weak.