I have from time to time danced under the name "Woodcock" but I have never hunted them. I hadn't said anything other than "these plus-fours are very silly," and this remark was not even directed to her. She was talking about a country club called Timberdoodle:
http://www.timberdoodleclub.com/
It may be very nice - I have never visited.
Well, the 3 piece suit has 'em all excited over there in Styless-forum land.
http://www.styleforum.net/t/253600/why-no-love-for-the-three-piece-suit
Last edited by formby (2011-10-15 15:31:58)
You have to consider that Alden supplies iconic tradulicious models to the Brothers Brooks, while AE supplies shoes to Zappos. Otherwise your statement about their inferiority when compared to even the most pedestrian English, and probably quite a few Italian, makers seems accurate.
The EG factory sale
http://www.styleforum.net/t/270032/anyone-going-to-the-eg-factory-sale-saturday
Involves people thousands of miles away touting for info on unseen shoes in their size. There is also mention of 'jonesing' which is probably some unspeakable American practice - possibly an obscure foot fetish.
Ends up with a complaint about how rude Edward Green are now that Danny DeVito is the store manager and wistful reflections on good service and Jermyn Street as it used to be.
Last edited by Maximilien de Robespierre (2011-10-16 11:57:17)
Last edited by Gilgamesh2003 (2011-10-16 12:15:49)
Last edited by Maximilien de Robespierre (2011-10-16 16:31:28)
Gil - reasonable effort, as far as it goes.
I assume you posted here for peer review and scientific checking?
My initial feedback (I haven't finished the complete analysis - am waiting for my Post Doc students to run the numbers), but I'd venture to suggest you have over simplified the work required to fit a shoe.
In particular might I point out that you seem to have neglected to mention the great Italian Shoe Artisan, inventor of Spella Checca and pragmatic Mathematician - Fibonacci. When it comes to shoe length, I'm sure other scholars here will agree with me when I say that a thorough knowledge of the Fibonacci numbers is central.
Known as the The Golden Rule or cut the Fibonacci is the age old "secret" that enables the Italians to achieve not only great fitting shoes but great looking shoes with that insouciance sprezz that all strive for.
To do this take a shoe length and divide it into two parts, L (Long part) and S (short part). We want the ratio of short part (toe to ball of foot) to long part (heel to ball of foot) be the same as the ratio of long part to the whole line (W). In other words, as the short part is to the long part, so is the long part to the whole line.
S:L = L:W
From this can be solved that L = (√5 + 1)/2 × S or L ≈ 1.618 × S. This number (√5 + 1)/2 is Phi.
So if you divide the line so that heel to ball part is Phi times (about 1.62) the length from ball to toe, you've divided it in the golden section (or golden cut).
And the golden ratio is the ratio Phi:1.
errata: Page 1 Abstract
One of my students has just pointed out that the original Fibonacci University Shoe Heel Institute Theory (FU Shit) was in fact the ratio of width of shoe, at widest point, to length of shoe. My misinterpretation of length to toe ball heel etc was a result of inferior translation from the original latin. nb:: the original translation was performed by one of my female PhD students of The Art of Bunga Bunga