Last edited by fxh (2010-12-21 18:05:41)
Our (godzone) perception of BBQ is vastly different to what one begins to understand about our septic brothers is when one visits say Texas - (its so big that only two of our 7 states are smaller).
For us a BBQ essentially means cooking outside and standing around drinking whilst someone burn fatty tough chops or steak and sausages then serves them up with fresh white bread and tomato sauce. Americans, at least in Texas where I've experienced it , have a whole way of gently cooking meat so it has a smokey tender flavour and many great sauces and dressings.
Now admittedly our BBQ has improved in the last 10 years with shaslicks, koftas, seafood and Asian stuff on a stick. But I'd be very embarrassed to take a proper Texan to most Australian BBQs. They simply do it better.
Last edited by Maximilien de Robespierre (2010-12-22 09:06:53)
I see considerable confusion here between real BBQ and "grilling".
http://www.bunnings.com.au/products_category_barbecues_117.aspx?page=1
Above theres a whole lot more typical Oz ones - most backyards would have a variation on these
Last edited by fxh (2010-12-22 09:23:17)
Note to fellow aussies - I feel somewhat patriotic in (inadvertently mind you) being the first to bring Bunnings into the Cultural Reference thread. {wipes tear from eye - bites trembling lip]
Last edited by Maximilien de Robespierre (2010-12-22 09:33:09)
My Christmas present for all you aussies:
http://www.styleforum.net/showthread.php?t=215082
Mine's a Weber Summit S-420 (natural gas hook-up rather than propane)
http://www.weber.com/explore/Grill_details.aspx?glid=3&mid=13
We're going to have a Brazilian BBQ on Xmas Day: we're having some neighbours for lunch. I'll bear in mind how long brisket takes.
Ha ha ha! Yo! Farofa is like sawdust and most cachaca tastes of motor fuel.
Make sure to let us know if you burn off those dark (dyed?) eyebrows of yours, Nicholas, or that luxuriant 'stache. I suggest leaving the panama inside the house and using a tie clip (if you've ever operated heavy machinery, you'll know why).
http://www.styleforum.net/showthread.php?t=216010
I couldn't decide if the above was for inanities or not.
I was then going to comment but found myself in an unfamiliar state, as the cliche goes, stuck for words.
I'm not sure if the particular treatise, (by christinedaae - the nick itself first suggesting troll to me, but now I'm thinking its serious) in several parts, on "dating" women (I suspect it really is girls not women) is an example of a specific american youthful peculiarity or if it has spread and is not confined to the US of A.
It seems to me that what is unique is the combination of unexamined arrogance and a superficial appearance of articulateness mixed with an underlying naivety not recognised by the "baller" personality I assume our poster sees in the mirror.
The whole "dating" thing is an Americanism I've never really understood.