Part One of me thinking out loud...
Feel free to ask any questions as that will help me to focus on what it is I'm trying to say...
Having established that the American Ivy League style in England and especially London is nothing to do with AAAC 'Trad' and has no upper class pretentions, I'd like to try to button down what it actually IS as opposed to endlessly talking about what it isn't.
The fact that Mr. John Simons has championed the look for the last 40 years over here is well known.
The links to Modernism and Modern Jazz are also well documented by now.
There is a Skinhead connection and a Mod (different to Modernist) connection too.
Because John Simons has been THE driving force of the Ivy League look over here from 1965 onwards what we have is probably very much one man's vision or version. But that's OK as it's such a good version.
It's the take on the style that I came across first and so I've always viewed Brooks/Press/Andover/The Crimson (All of which I saw after I'd 'found' J. Simons) through the lense of his interpretation of The Look. It was his aesthetic judgement that I always had to whatever degree in the back of my mind when I used to stroll around Harvard Square. It was his direction that I was always coming from.
Everybody needs a good teacher.
So what is the Ivy League look in London?
It probably has more Americana mixed in with it than in the States.
I've mentioned Carhartt over here before (and seen it subsequently taken up by the AAAC boys as something of their Grandfather's that they've suddenly found in the attic - That old chestnut!), and workwear brands are certainly in the mix over here along with the much more 'dressed-up' elements of the look.
Probably because there are no class connotations associated to the look over here there is no fetish for always having 'the best'. Little known brands with charm are often valued more. Cue: Buffalo Creek Traders! A Nothing-named Scotchgrain Penny Loafer from the mid-Eighties which had Ivy style in spades, but Alden it wasn't.
It's all about the style over here and a display of taste & knowledge, not class or wealth.
(Quick break to do a little work - back soon.)
Last edited by Terry Lean (2006-11-30 11:08:29)
Peter York in 'Modern Times', 1984, talking about Graphic Designers...
"... Frank has always, but always loved good grey flannel, and he's always loved girls who are slightly bandy like Julie Christie - and from about the same time. Ditto the loafers, which are actually Bass Weejuns in the classic colour bought in that shop in Covent Garden that specialises in the Ivy style, just like the place in Richmond that he went to in the sixties."
T.L.
This should be an insightful thread. You've mentioned before that people from all walks of life wear Ivy, including cabbies (etc.), but how do you identify them? What sets them apart from say old Skinheads, or MODs, or New Edwardians?
I have a more mundane question about Ivy in your country.
Where are the stores generally found?
In America, Ivy League style backs itself with that social class bit by (generally, O'Connells a seeming exception in Buffalo, NY) placing its stores in areas that were either classic Ivy league student havens (the New Haven Press and the other old campus shops Crimson, Langrock, Hillhouse, etc) or areas of wealth and business--downtown in the cities, Manhattan, San Francisco, the Andover branch of the Andover shop, or the old (not the current) Outdoor Traders in Greenwich, CT or Murray's on Nantucket.
Since that sort of thing does not lurk in the background with the Ivy look in Britain, are the stores that sell it also found in plainer surroundings?
Or are they all in London but just on a certain street that is associated with the look and the subcultures in the country that subscribe to it?
MOD seems to have been a very youth-oriented style. If so, then it's not surprising that when MODs grew up they'd look for a more low-key style which shares some basic elements.
The New Edwardian style seems to be a very fuzzy and narrow in scope. The only photo I've seen was in a book and it showed a 3-piece pinstripe suit with bum-freezer jacket, very narrow lapels, peg-leg pants, and a shirt with detachable Eton collar (plus the inevitable bowler/coke hat).
The Ivy-Mod look seems to be more prevalent with the really early years of Mod, late 50s-62 or so, when jazz was the main music of choice. After that it definitely went more Continental with Italian influences in the cut of suit, shoes, mode of transport etc..and less jazz as the music of choice, replaced by soul/beat/motown. The only Ivy carryover might have been in the shirts by the mid 60s. Once mod metamorphed into skinhead, again the shirts were the only obvious influence of Ivy....oh, and maybe some footwear choices as loafers were popular among both subcultures for quite a while.
I never thought Teds/Edwardians had much Ivy influence at all...perhaps accidentally, but nothing that seems to be a deliberate influence.
I'd agree with all of that, Get Smart.
'The New Edwardians' started as a Savile Row style worn by young Guards officers immediately after WWII. The Gay wearers of the look who took it over would be the circles of Cecil Beaton, Oliver Messel, Bunny Roger and Norman Parkinson. Rather theatrical and camp dandies in the late '40's early '50's. Then the style was taken down-market by the Teds.
It's an English style "born of haughty disdain for popular American fashion of the 'boxer' or 'Al Capone' ilk." and so not a part of Ivy in England, although it was in part a reaction against American clothing styles in England so it comes into the story in that respect.
(That's what I found out overnight anyway.)
The youth subcuture part of the story is as Get Smart says probably more related to the 50's/early 60's Jazz listening 'Modernist' period, not so much the post '63 'Mod' era when tastes broadly changed as G.S. describes.
The Modernists would have been shopping at Austins in Shaftsbury Avenue for American Ivy imports pre-'65 when the Ivy Shop opened in Richmond.
The Mod/Skinhead overlap period of (say) '67-'69 when the Ivy Shop was probably at the hight of it's success would have been a very Ivy orientated time too I think, especially in West London.
Another group of wearers of the look I'll do next (as work allows) is TV & Advertising people, both industries where the smart but relaxed good looks of the Ivy style made it fit in very well with their business cultures.
The Thames TV studios in Teddington were not too far from the Ivy Shop in Richmond...
Actually I should extend that comment about TV & Ad people to include most creative types especially in the mid-eighties when Peter York was observing Graphic Designers in the quote up above.
I think it's the soft construction and added individuality that wearing a BD & a natural shoulder jacket gives you that makes the style attractive to creative folk. It's the relaxed look it has... and yet it's all dressed-up, grown-up & smart. They love knitted ties too...
Because Ivy League clothing IS a little... casual... by English standards.
The BD IS a casual shirt.
The soft construction of Ivy suits & jackets IS very far removed from the stiff carapace of the average English Suit which looks towards military tunics in it's heart.
Ivy in England is comfortable, a little slouchy, a bit laid back. It's classic but not uptight-white-knuckle-trying-too-hard-Savile-Row-wannabe classic.
It's a bit more hip & cool.
THIS is why it bugs the English 9 to 5 boys...
Wearing a suit is good, but wearing a suit that plays with what a suit is & what a suit means is not at all on. It offends their limited sensibilities of what the world is & how the world should be. It looks a little like taking the piss out of the idea of being all-dressed-up-for-work-in-a-suit. It looks a bit like you're suiting yourself!
Shock! Horror!!
Nobody likes somebody who doesn't appear to be playing the game...
And EVERYBODY hates somebody who seems to be playing their own game and having fun into the bargin.
Ahhh England!
The only Ivy I ever saw at the BBC was in the mirror. They all aspired to different styles there. You'd see BDs though.
Thames TV had Ivy jackets on producers & directors especially in the summer. BDs & loafers too. Even a bit of Khaki Seersucker up at Euston Road. Hello Simon!
Channel Four back in Charlotte Street had a lot of natural shoulders at one point. Again especially in the summer in & outside 'Zanzibar' (sp?)
Ahem.
So that's another part of Ivy in England in my experience. Creative types in the Media wore it along with Mod Taxi drivers etc.
A wonderful melting pot, Ivy in the UK...
(... Can you tell I'm drunk?)
Next in this exciting journey I'll take you all out after work with me...
And because we all work in TV & advertising we'll pop into the odd Gay bar & club in the process where we will meet the guys who wear the 'All-American-Boy' look. We'll avoid the Clones in 'The Colehern' who are rather stern looking chaps, but we will visit 'Heaven' & get talking to some nice people who know all about the Ivy style and who will help to take us on to the next interesting part of our travels...
We have yet to find out all about the Jewish Ivy guys in London and to journey across to Paris to meet the king of Le Minets! On the way we will also meet a couple of Portuguese waiters who will have much to tell us about Ivy style at home in Portugal and then later on abroad in South Africa... And then an old German man will recall Hamburg in '62...
Thank you for reading.
Terry Lean.
A tawny black suit bosthist, for the Ivy crowd!? I suppose I shouldnt be surprised but that's quite illuminating.
FNB:
On the first scan you can see the mark left by a swatch of the tawny-black herringbone tweed which was inserted into the magaine. I'll try to scan the swatch.
When you get some time, Terry, can you name any famous Ango-Ivy wearers?
You could even argue that there is a lack of aspiration in a way associated with the Ivy League look in England...
There is an element of opting out, of non-conformity and even of an active rejection of the status quo.
Ivy wearers over here are pretty much just following their own aesthetic tastes, being different in their own way & pursuing different goals.
For me it's all about going my own way & not having anymore than I can help to do with all the rubbish that surrounds me.
Quite happy indulging my own tastes.
REALLY like that Tawny Black.
As a Chipp customer of the mid '60s, I always admired their insouciance (e.g. patch madras, wide striped ties ahead of their time, box calf in belts). But where would you wear the ring belt shown in the ad and with what trouser? Tries very hard.
This is cool:
My next installment here is the Gay connection (That 'All American Boy' look) that helped keep Ivy going in England during the lean years between the big youth subculture boom of the style in the '60's and the 'Preppy' revival of the early 80's.
Because the only story I can really tell is my own & that of my friends I've been bothering them to try to find something fresh to say here. Just another good excuse to talk endlessly to everyone I know...
Paul Gambaccini's name keeps coming up as an influence without him ever trying to be an influence. The boys would just see him out in a polo shirt & pay attention.
And EVERYBODY says I should keep Paul's name out of whatever nonsense I'm going to write.
I like that. That sense of community.
Mr. Gambaccini (A native New Yorker) comes into the story of Ivy in England in as much as he looked cool and 'American' and got noticed as such around town. Some people liked his style & some people copied him.
Never met the man but he is liked & loved by just about every Gay Anglo-Ivy stylist that I know.
http://www.mnemonics.co.uk/paul/