Maybe this is a good thing. I wonder how the class implications and ornament reconcile with typical communist ideology?
http://www.theeastisred.com/cufflinks/cufflink3.htm
Were french cuffs really that much of a signifier of class then? (And are they now?). Weren't their use so widespread that it wouldn't raise an eyebrow should a commie sport them? (I take it that commies in the Kremlin lived it up despite their classless society...).
It is not a secret, that especially statesmen, independent from their political direction, have been used as testiomnial for fine clothes or bespoke shoes.
Not "commies" in the common sense but deep red socialists:
Bruno Kreisky, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruno_Kreisky, had his shoes made at Scheer, Vienna, www.scheer.at
or Gerhard Schröder was always named to wear suits from Brioni.
I went to Christie's recent pre auction gallery display of Post-War and Contemporay art and there were enough Mao portraits and paintings to make me wonder if the man has been gone sufficiently long to have become a pop icon ala Che?
This is an interesting piece. Nothing says cultural revolution like a little wax fruit under glass:
http://www.theeastisred.com/misc/misc8.htm
Last edited by Vaclav (2007-05-15 15:30:02)
And let us not overlook the Totalitarian Regime over somewhere else. Not true communism since everyone is not equal, but the Secret Police are known to be most efficient.
Yours in the movement.
Cheers,
Trip