...
I think the AAAC 'trad' style is very costumey....with the bowties, cords with crabs on them, etc. The way many of those fellas wear it, it is as costumey to me as guys wearing zoot suits and all that goes with that look.
Theyve moved, the crabs are now on the jacket.
Style (at least for clothing items) begins to become costume when ordinary people feel they can make fun of you for wearing it.
Style becomes costume when the set of people who would ordinarily appreciate the item make fun of you for wearing it.
Makes sense.
Why is 'costume' such a big U.S. insult though?
You never hear the term over here.
... Just interested.
A couple of times I've lent suits to chums who wanted 'a disguise' to go & see the bank in. They were obviously putting on a costume to play a role but the consensus was that they had just been smart.
I suspect I've missed the point of this whole U.S. 'costume' thing... A cultural difference maybe? Are we more flexible about our integrity over here in England? I suspect we may be...
Anyone fancy putting me straight?
Thanks -
TL - jeans were invented in America. That's all you really need to know.
H
Ahhhhhh!
Thank you for putting me straight.
Wait a min. -
I read that the Huge notes invented them.
You wouldn't be pulling my leg would you?
t.
It becomes a costume when it all matches or "goes together".
Or, simply looks too good or assembled by a stylist...
...or if it looks like it could be in a catalogue.
Such as the oh-so carefully nonchalant Ralph Lauren ads.
And that goes for Flusser, etc.
Don't forget the Trad dog and Trad girlfriend threads (now if any 2 deserved to be merged it was those!!!!)
Perhaps once, a person talks about their style, too much.
I was thinking of costume as something archaic or stuck in time (though white tie for instance might fit this bill as would roots of modern manly fashion, they're still in use so I'd rule them out). So Terry, something like the uniform of a city gent -- a bowler hat and brolly and pinstripe DB all together -- would be costume. As would a bowler hat by itself. But the DB and brolly themselves or together wouldn't be.
I haven't paid as much attention as I like to the AAAC trad threads, so I don't know about them being costumey. But maybe a few are.
I also think that some of the lads on Fedora Lounge are total costume. Others can pull a look together that is more timeless. Note FNB's article on Tree of Style where the fogey meets the old boy. The old boy doesn't wear a costume, though he incorporates elements of the fogey, who does wear "costume". At leas that's my take on it.
Hmmmm...
Let's save our energy for something else, eh?
I've not observed a Casual for years. If I could get in touch with Brother V. I'd ask him when he last saw one. He's more alert than me.
Let me try again...
It's costume when it's out of place by reason of time or location?
So my 1958 Stadium Chic look is costume on 2 counts!
How right the forumites were to condemn me...
By George, I think I've got it!
Phew!
I almost torched my entire wardrobe there...
Yup, I'd say 'classic & timeless' are the best excuses for me.
I do, however, see the point that by heavy handed exaggeration any style can become a parody of itself and thereby end up as costume.
I think that that point of view resonates with Get Smart's observations above.
Once one says 'I'm going to be an xyz' and then sets about having to have an xyz car, xyz job, xyz girlfriend, xyz haircut, etc., then one is off down the road to Trad-gedy.
One's 'trademark' style should always be a grace note lightly played above the leitmotif of ones own innate taste and personality...
Or something.
*Must... stop... drinking... before... lunch.*
l.
When you're an American and try a bit too hard to dress to appear like you're British or Italian.