it was the same thing for us "new breed" American skinheads in the 80s
it was difficult and showed how much effort you put in to get ahold of Fred Perry and Ben Shermans. Some local shops would take trips to London a couple times/year and bring back gear, which would be gone in a week or two. We'd scour all the local mom n pop tennis shops to see if they had any old stock Fred Perry tennis gear, and end up buying a couple shirts in sizes far too large for us but having it made us more "authentic" than the next guy who couldnt get one and had to wear some wannabe polo shirt.
same attitude, different side of the pond. turns out the grass is green on both sides of the fence
It hurt me a bit to go up Regent Street and into Brooks. True modernist business should be conducted up cobbled back streets smelling of kebab meat and urine. A dark little shop with a few pairs of deadstock Royals, right next door to a shebeen from which old Delroy Wilson sounds are floating and a wizened little man grabs your sleeve and tells you he knows a place off Cable Street hustling Big E Levis... Brooks is Sainsburys...
Yes, interesting.
I never quite got stuff like George Marshall's 'Skinhead Nation', but the transference of that look to the US is quite fascinating: Yanks taking back their own style, but their own style subverted by the English. I'd reckon not many Brits on here have never worn a Fred Perry polo shirt at some time in their lives, even if only to feel relaxed around the house. The Ben Sherman, of course, was a cheap English copy of an American shirt - English mods wanted Brooks Brothers: the original. Because they were hard to come by. We were only just emerging from an age of austerity by 1960. Modernists like John Simons grew up in a grey age: hence the deep and abiding interest in West Coast jazz and TNSL.
Really interesting to read all your thoughts gents.Surely snobbery is the whole reason this site exists in the first place, because we all want to be recognised and congratulated for our good taste. If we really didn't give a shit we certainly wouldn't take up so much of our time searching out garments for their history or credibility. We find like minded people here to talk to because outside of the site no-one cares less or even knows what shoes we are wearing.
All style movements have their snobbery. I was very involved in Punk Rock scene and that was one of the worst, considering it was supposed to be totally against all things material.
This site is where people can flaunt their snobbery and be proud of it.
By the way you should dig my brand new bongos, like wild man...
Looking at the characters in that photo, "crusties" appears to be the most factually accurate name tagged to any of these tribes. Ever.
Time to take a step backwards.
Pause for thought and reflect.
I feel a deep sense of responsibility.
That word 'snobbery' - very emotive. Not that Americans are incapable of it, as you will know if you've read your 'Enry James.
Let's say it this way: our forefathers were perhaps a bit envious. The United States, as far as I am concerned, is the finest country in the world. Too many young Americans died on Omaha beach for me not to defend the United States to kneejerk Brits.
Okay.
Ivy style is yours. If you want it. It originated, if you like, over here but as something lacking in the egalitarian spirit. Eventually, of course, as we know, it was mass marketed - hence all those lovely magazine adverts some of us are proud to own. And the UK claimed it. The East End of London claimed it. Took it to its heart. Not too many of them, mind - it was a little bit secretive, a touch exclusive. The 'mod' was a slightly different kind of creation, and his look and style crossed the Atlantic and was adopted by American youth who dug the Beatles, Stones, Carnaby Street. There was the 'Carnaby mod' by then: peacock proud: and some of his younger, soul-loving brothers were about to become...
The wearers of Ben Sherman.
But not the Ivy League guys. They were real magpies, turning their eyes yearningly to Paris and Rome: collecting, amassing, assimilating, evolving, mixing, matching and moving on - not in a dramatic, obvious sense like John Stephens' boys, but as part of a gradual, never-ending process. The Look changed, went a little strange for a time, but the essential strictness and firmness of purpose remained.
It remains yet.
Clothesville, Squire, the Ivy Shop, Village Gate, J. Simons - these have been the magnets. For almost half a century.
But Ivy remains American. It's just that, quite possibly, we love the alien more than our own back yards.
Flanagan and Allen... the Coen Brothers... we're the deadly duo...
Only if I can be fanny...
(That ought to provoke Cheeky...)...
Last edited by Alex Roest (2009-04-27 14:02:57)
I'd like to see it, too, Alex - speaking as a non-Londoner. I don't think, however, that a chap like Gibson Gardens is likely to play ball. The debate is probably a bit nebbish for his tastes. I take full responsibility; only wanted to try and put it into some form of sociological context.