l was only joking Bishop. lt was one of Vox's photoshops again.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2012-07-19 19:09:02)
Last edited by Bishop of Briggs (2012-07-24 12:57:55)
I know it goes a bit far, and the colours may better suit an interior than an outfit, but I like the colour work he does, not much else mind.
I still like him, but I wouldn't wear those combinations myself.
What's the red blob in the buttonhole for?
I reckon it's a fishermen's friend.
Besides preadolescent girls, does anyone else wear this many bracelets?
Also, what's the poo under the crummy tie knot?
I was talking to that bloke just the other day.
Shooey may have got shoes from him.
The watch, could it be, yes it is, that ugly emblem of extreme vulgarity and dubious taste: a Rolex Daytona.
Are they prayer beads? If they are i'm not sure any prayers have been answered
OK Hepcat, them's fightin' words when you put down Rolex.
Granted, it is the poseurs "go to" watch, but...
Have had my stainless steel oyster perpetual for 32 years through nasty road bike tumbles, have seen friends wristwaches die in a squash court while mine doesn't even get the glass cracked, never off in the shower, body surfing, whatever. And on to dinner in a nice restaurant.
Rolex rocks.
The Oyster cases are a design classic, flawless. I have no qualms there in vintage pieces.
It is the new Rolex as a luxury brand that I take umbridge with. The strength of Rolex was always peerless ruggedness, quality and longevity. They have now positioned themselves as the purveyors of pling and the evidence of this is found in their tinkering with design classic that is the Explorer I, making it larger and putting pling and fanciness around the crown.
Rolex rocks, in its vintage pieces, this cannot be challenged.
What's with all the bracelets?