But if your into a style of dress surely you'd wear that style for work as well? Its not like your spending a lot on those garments is it?

Didn't Yuca recently say he was taking on a position that required him to wear polo shirts every day?  I mean, no reason he must also wear polo shirts outside the office.

I might as well give my opinion re. Verrgate: it's a good photo and is not necessarily the harbinger of a series of neoprep shots, so Bop's comments to me don't make sense, particularly in light of some of the other shots that pass without criticism on here. However I do think CB's 'Salvation Army mannequin' dig might have unintentionally provoked Bop into not quite keeping his posts up to their usual deeply considered, highly articulate level.

Also bringing up Mercer16 is about the most depressing thing I can think of, but for the record - he may well have been borderline ivy but the point is that he looked like shit and made no attempt to be any more than looking like shit. As illustrated by his abusive PM to Oliver when Oliver politely and tactfully tried to give him an insight into forum etiquette.

Obviously the title of the thread does not refer to whether or not someone is trying to give us a nice photo, but I think it's implicit that the photo must at least have some slight likelihood of not looking like shit, even if only in the eyes of the person in it. Therefore all support of him was misguided to say the least. If Verr is wrong but Mercer16 was right then we need to change the thread title to 'How crap can you look?'

Last edited by Yuca (2015-08-16 14:49:10)

You may be right with my inability to read your posts and make sense of them at times.

Did I say I was offended?