You are not logged in.

#1 2006-07-14 11:38:11

Miles Away
Member
From: Miles away
Posts: 1180

Less is more... (?)

How about playing with the aesthetic of 'unsophisticated' taste?
A deliberately unrefined form of Dandyism?

Heavy shoes which don't remotely aspire to elegance?
A certain pleasing coarseness of Tweed?
A 'rough' look?
Burly, even?

Nothing effete or sophisticated, but still planned, plotted and executed with care.

No cashmere or other 'luxury' fabrics, no obvious 'clothes-horse' touches, just... MENSwear?

Can it still be done without it becomming a form of 'Drag' or parody?

Are we now too far removed from the world when (we imagine) men 'just got dressed' and yet looked great?

I've been looking at old family photos this PM and remembering some of the men pictured. They look good to me now. Back then they were just... ordinary. I imagine they 'just got dressed', maybe I'm kidding myself. I have no way of knowing what they thought about their wardrobes, or even if they thought much about them at all. I just like their look, that's all.

Strike a chord with anyone?

David.


" ... Ubi bene, ibi patria, which being roughly translated means, 'Wherever there's a handout, that's for me, man.' "
Alistair Cooke. 1968.

 

#2 2006-07-14 16:30:25

Marc Grayson
Member
Posts: 8860

Re: Less is more... (?)

I subscribe to the "less is more" approach to dressing, however mine is one of understated sartorial deportment---Nearly to the point of being off the public radar screen, and enjoying my clothes in quietude while among the masses.


"‘The sense of being perfectly well dressed gives a feeling of inner tranquility which even religion is powerless to bestow." Ralph Waldo Emerson
"Looking good and dressing well is a necessity. Having a purpose in life is not."  Oscar Wilde

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2008 Rickard Andersson