Are they going to claim that "Britain First" is anti-semitic?  The ADL did that over here when Trump used the "America First" line.  Apparently they were upset that any nation dare put their own interests above those of the Jewish State. 
http://www.adl.org/press-center/press-releases/anti-semitism-usa/adl-urges-donald-trump-to-reconsider-america-first.html

A bit of whataboutary going on up there.

It's interesting, outside of the new Labour activists, everyone I speak to is aghast at the thought of Corbyn being PM. Where does the truth lie? We shall soon find out later this week.

Meanwhile, overnight news of 50 suspended Labour party members, some from those northern wards where the grooming was going on. Right on brother, focusing on the real issues that effect the day to day lives of the people. As your daughters are getting their tongues hammered to tables and past around the gangs as meat and slaves. That's the dilemma and hypocrisy of the new Left. They don't give a rats ass about the traditional working or underclass. Indeed, you're just an embarrassment to them now they have true revolutionaries and more lofty versions of aged old bigotry to play with.

The resistance is growing by the way, everywhere.....

But can you not see? This is why the Left has failed and been given up on: they focus on niche protest issues and have no position on existential threats, other than they are revolutionary movements therefore we like and share ideology with. The hard Left should look at the history of an Iran in the run-up and aftermath of the revolution. The communist and socialist revolutionaries were major players in the overthrow of the Shah, then they were snuffed out by the ayatollah. That's the future that awaits them!

They are debating whether Israel has a right to exist, whether hating Israelis is anti-semitic or not, whether Bradford should be jewish free or not, whether individual jewish shopkeepers and students should be shunned under Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, whilst the rest of us look on thinking what planet are these people on?

The threats to the traditional Labour voters are not coming from Israel.

The hypocrisy of the Left now knows no bounds and that's why myself and many others have given up on them.

It's like the mask of sanity has been lifted off them and we stare into the abyss of madness!

It's no accident that this row has blown up just before the local elections.

And you excuse me of hyperbole! Sensationalist dribble, but in keeping with Labour's bête noire.

I think basically what needs to happen is it all gets sorted out.. 👍

Any ideology that gives reason for us to slaughter each other really isnt the move...or are we going to carry on like primates till we destroy ourselves

Last edited by Bop (2016-05-05 11:10:52)

HBH is back

Anti Zionism is not racism. Below is a simple explanation, in very few words, lifted from socialist worker.

(Bribing countries and buying influence is no justification for taking other people's land. Even when those who were bribed keep quiet about it.)


Zionism is based on the idea that Jewish people cannot live peacefully alongside non-Jews.

Zionists see antisemitism as inevitable and argue that the only answer is the setting up of an exclusively Jewish state. This led to migration to Palestine and ethnic cleansing after the Second World War.

For Palestinians, this has meant brutal racist oppression since Israel was set up in 1948 in alliance with western imperialism.

Israeli settlers forcibly displaced hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, forcing them into refugee camps where many remain.

This brutal process—and denying Palestinians the “right to return”—is justified by Zionism.

Those Palestinians who’ve managed to remain live under occupation or siege in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza. Israeli settlers continue to build settlements in the West Bank.

Israeli society has racism at its heart. Opposing Israel and its underlying Zionist ideology is not antisemitic, but anti-racist.

Should Israel have the right to exist?
The “two state solution”, with Israeli and Palestinian states existing side by side, is no solution.

It would do nothing to address the huge imbalance of power that exists between Israel and Palestine.

Israel would continue to oppress Palestinians because it would see a Palestinian state as a threat.

It would win support from the US and Western powers, which back Israel for their own imperialist interests.

Israel’s incursions into Palestinian territory make a two state solution unfeasible. And such a “solution” would not give Palestinians the right of return.

Israel faces a problem as a settler society—what to do with the people it has dispossessed?

The only real solution is to allow Palestinians the right to return and for Jews and Arabs to live together in a democratic, secular state.

The socialist and internationalist case for the liberation of Palestine is not one in which Jewish people are expelled, but one where they live alongside free Palestinians.

Naz Shah’s tweets about “moving Israel to the US” wrongly suggested Jews would be driven out or forcibly removed.

Palestinian liberation can only be achieved as part of a broader fight for liberation against imperialism.

The granny in the defamation film is right. She would look to live alongside Palestinians not steal their land
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FDxQgTDsf0

Ben Gurion, on the other hand, was of the opinion that the solution was to expel all the Palestinians.

As has been stated before, all this 'anti semitism', 'racism' stuff is just a distraction from the main issue  - when zionists think they are under too much scrutiny, or people say things they do not like.

Classic hasbara tactic.