^A very interesting video that, Rob and it's a well 'sussed' thing to have posted it too. An open conclusion as far as I'm concerned though , then again you knew I was going to comment something like that
Good post, Jim. Without disapproval there can be no tolerance and all that....
I don't know the American take on all of this; nor, really, the continental. Ivy League, when confined to the Harvard/Yale/Princeton etc. grouping, must have been snobbish, elitist, call it what you will: Andover, the little snot-noses who pissed off Holden Caulfield etc. Post-war, in some ways, as the advertising men got to work on it, it became fashion, and then faded as fashions will. The 50s became the 60s: and we all know what happened then: Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Vietnam, Mayor Daley and all the rest.
In England, though, it was all about inside, arcane knowledge - it still is. Snobbery. Elitism. 'Suss'. Being In The Know. Punk was amazingly snobbish, but almost more so were the elements swirling around it, who'd witnessed the Roxy scene (the club, not the group) early on and found it limiting and a tad juvenile. John Lydon must have been feeling that way by '78 at the latest. Even in the circles I moved around 'hip' was snobbish and snobbish was 'hip': we began treating it as an in-joke. It was 'hip', by late '77-early '78, to like James Brown, the more beatnik forms of bebop, and the kind of stuff Chris Sullivan was pushing. It was 'hip' to go French: read Camus and walk around with a Gauloise glued to your bottom lip: all slouch and grimace. New York - and hence Brooks etc. - was inaccessible: most of us were the sons of manual labourers or office workers, the products of the comprehensive system. Rare soul and jazz-funk was another swirl before the mod revival came along: Northern Soul was a bit prole but it still had its adherents.
The trick was to be stylish and to experiment: shawl sweaters, Cuban heels, bum-freezers, shades, pegged trousers, painted ties, wrecked leather jackets. Mix and match. Then along came 'mod' and a new, more pathetic form of snobbery came into existence, perpetuated by people who wore parkas but caught the bus home. Time to get out. I moved away; sharpened my intellect; starting going to see plays by Pinter and Orton; reading widely, preparing for higher education.
My introduction to Ivy was very gradual: a BD here, a pair of chinos there. My father's American friend called it 'preppy' and couldn't understand why I'd be interested. To me, then, it was just a clean, dressed down look. I stepped it up eventually but am now toning it down again. People still think I'm snobbish about it, but they tend to smile indulgently rather than grow angry.
The trick also was to avoid walking round the wrong corner and getting a punch...
Last edited by Alex Roest (2009-04-30 02:01:32)
Interesting how unsnobbish John Simons is. He'll willingly share information. Never seems concerned to keep things to himself. I've been steered in the right direction on a number of occasions.
Mm - wine snobbery, to use just one example, is infuriating (not that it means anything to me, as a non-drinker): its adherents look like those silly c****s on these effing antiques programmes I dare say. There - that's me culturally stereotyping and having a great big chip on my shoulder!
Just like Gibson Gardens being sneered at by that prat Pete Burns for buying Dexter Gordon, we used to get the lip-curl treatment from one particular specimen (now working for Barney's in NYC, I believe) for maybe liking The Cramps instead of Funkapolitan. (Mind you, this lad did say to me one day that he knew of some London boys who were going to do quite well. Turned out to be Spandau Ballet). A period in flux that one, with me studying the pictures of Charlie Parker and Thad Jones and having a little think to myself. I expect Paolo was still sucking his thumb at the time. Mioaw!
Speaking of Hewitt, though, check out Patrick Uden in 'Soul Stylists'. He says it with more authority than I ever can. I wasn't there. Sucking my own thumb, no doubt.
I have to say that I do look up to many Americans on our subject. That always gets forgotten. But it's also true that I think very little of even more of our fellow online chatterboxes. I place myself in the middle of the spectrum. Never at the top.
Last edited by Prof Kelp (2009-04-30 05:30:41)
Big difference between US east coast snobbery and Anglo East End suss and attitude. Eons apart. London again. Take a thing and twist it around. JS said it. Jim Ferguson said it.
Wise words, PK.
I'm actually beyond the 'Snob' tag now that I've been dubbed a Fascist (Well... 'Russell' was...).
All of this feeds itself I think. 'Trads' knew nothing & were so full of themselves that we wanted to spit on them and so their snobbery made snobs of us. What a world!
Everything remains of interest though. Other people's fantasies can tell you a lot. As for me, I've just got a low BS threshold. When I see somebody posturing I feel the need to call them on it.
How are we ever going to talk sense if we spend our time talking about 'the Tradly way of life'?
A sane man would ignore it all.
Perhaps it might be helpful to throw in some influences here we could think of as being snobby / elitist. The most strikingly obvious example is Miles Davis--slouched, unsmiling, and intense. He hated the way other jazz musicians acted like entertainers trying to make the audience feel like they were having fun and did the reverse, refusing to introduce the band members and turning his back on the audience at times. Did he look cool doing it? Damn right.
However, we have to consider this deeper. First, Davis had a lot of baggage from growing up facing seriously fucked racial politics, recovering from heroin addiction and dealing w/ a corrupt musical industry where it was routine for managers and club-owners to rob musicians blind. It's my understanding that he had trust issues for his entire life. While he looked cool being distant and elitist, it's also not too hard to figure that that his distance / cool was a pretty necessary defensive mechanism to deal with a lot of fucked-up shit.
Second, how well does this translate? We've all pretty much admitted that we don't hang out with too many people who share our peculiar interest in clothing, let alone an actual interest in the specific minutia of Ivy. So who are we going to be snobby to or elitist around? The girl at the coffee shop? Teenagers? Our coworkers? Guys you don't know at the pub wearing Ralph Lauren? I'd always prefer to be remembered as an easy-going friendly guy than as someone who was so distant that he made others nervous.
If I'm getting this wrong, explain how one can demonstrate a bit of elitism (I'm assuming that it has more to do w/ personality than w/ the actual clothes) and not come across as either ridiculous or annoying. These are all talking points, by the way. I realize I am coming across a bit intense and don't mean to.
Last edited by Decline & Fall (2009-04-30 08:55:17)
No, no, no D&F, they're all excellent points to be making.
You know what you know. You're willing to learn from others. You have a sense of proportion. You're willing to share and inform.
Miles could be pretty unpleasant, too - as he was to the young Valerie Wilmer.
Very interesting.
Maybe 'Snobbery'/'Elitism'/'Fascism' is more of an 'eye of the beholder' thing?
I'm happy to share what I know, but I still piss people off for correcting them when they say that which is not so.