good for you. its good to love your job. i am glad that you do. however, the post is not commenting on the typical experiences of a middle-aged london barrister. i attended law school in the US, i know plenty of american lawyers, in a variety of types of practice, and tony pretty much hits the nail on the head in regard to the situation here, for someone under, say, 40 at least.
if you had read the entire post, it would be apparent that tony is not knocking the legal profession, or the accounting profession for that matter. or drawing comfort from anyone's misery. he's saying that the hours of a young associate in a big downtown firm(in the US and canada, for all i know in jolly old england they work 35 hour weeks) are excessive, the work is generally boring, and the payoff for many never comes, all of which are facts. He ends by saying that starting one's own practice, away from the "bright lights", is a good alternative. the experiences of my friends seem to bear this out. read the damned thing before you shoot off about "bollocks" at me.
No, i dont, as he's clearly talking about certain types of firms, in the US (and possibly canada). if you were at all familiar with the situation here that would be abundantly clear to you.
Last edited by shamrockmonkey (2010-12-24 04:30:37)
Grossgrain
Leave it. They are not having a pop at you and it is Christmas. Goodwill to All and so on.
I can see what they are saying and I am sure you can too if you put your mind to it.
You seem to be getting a lot more combative these days.
Last edited by Maximilien de Robespierre (2010-12-24 10:08:11)
Last edited by Gilgamesh2003 (2010-12-25 15:19:05)
http://www.styleforum.net/showpost.php?p=3930110&postcount=25
"Grey flannel pants, solid grenadine ties and solid knit ties. These are what are on my acquisition list for 2011. Yet no bricks and mortar retailer offers these basics. Why? "
Not looking hard enough!
"The SF entrepreneurs are the only retailers that sell basic, foundational pieces. "
Bollocks!
"I do not forsee myself buying ties from anyone other than Sam Hober, Kent Wang or Howard Yount."
Nothing against our colleague Mr Hober but this is classic iGent inanity.
http://www.styleforum.net/showpost.php?p=3930468&postcount=32
"+1 for the long tail assessment as to what's available for purchase through SF merchants, but I think the OP's original observation is slightly different.
I'd say what you're witnessing is the formation of an SF "school." The formation of the SF school coincides with the settling of a group upon a single paradigm. In this case, the paradigm involves advice on certain styles, values of certain brands, etc.
Many people come here not to break the paradigm, but to learn it. There's interest in conformity rather than trend-setting. So I'd argue the observation of narrowing taste is simply a product of increased demand of conformers and increasing interest in the SF "school."
At the same time, I don't think this school development is bad because even trendsetters need a paradigm. It is the only way one can make an educated deviation from the norm (the same way a chef usually starts on the line at a well-established restaurant, or the way Lady Gaga started by studying at NYU's Tisch School).
Mapping this onto my personal experience here. I'd see my SF life in two stages.
Stage 1: Buy only what is deemed most suitable here by the majority (BB 1818 in solids, AE PAs, TM shirts, etc.)
Stage 2: Comfortable that I know what is considered suitable by the majority, branch out with my own style (e.g. embrace the three-piece, wear loafers with suits occasionally, look for unknown artisan labels, etc.)"
Jesus fucking Christ!
Last edited by Grossgrain Silk (2010-12-25 12:48:34)
Last edited by fxh (2010-12-25 13:00:00)
Last edited by fxh (2010-12-25 13:07:51)