Horace:
I thought I recalled some discussion about this, but a couple of searches yielded nothing. Anyway, are double vents trad? The orthodoxy seems against them, insisting that only a center vent -- indeed, perhaps only a hook vent -- is truly trad, but I would have thought that the anglophilic aspect of trad would smile upon side vents. What say you? I remain . . .
Yours in good cheer,
---Tyto
Dear Tyto
Well, I'm just an idiota, but I'd say that while I admire some of the thinking being the so-called orthodoxy, it's often misinformed or just plain ignorant. To my tastes, the hooked-vent is indubitably TNSIL, but if we look back into the archives of the varioius shops, we see that Brooks and Press and others have always had double vents. If we were to observe a "Brooks curriculum", we'd reinforce this fact. I tend to have fewer double vents (incl. my very small collection of bespoke gear & some older RTW Andover Shop), but I say do it if you like it. My only "thing" is that I don't care for too deep of a pair of vent like some of the British wear. And anyway, Brooks always had a strong English element to them. Before I became aware of these MB's, I always thought of natural-shouldered (or TNSIL as Pollock aptly put it) as "Anglo-American," so I agree with you about the anglophile element. Maybe a nice compromise is double vents on some odd jackets and single vents on suits. Though I even went no vents once in a futile attempt, which cemented by idiota status, to copy the Cary Grant suit in NxNW.
I just got a very jacket in single vent. I didn't go hooked-vent but I had been thinking, before I encountered your query, that maybe I should've done so. But depending upon the material, maybe it looks "more clean" without the hook.
Be of Good Cheer,
Horace
With apologies to Horace, my recollection is that, in the early '60s, Brooks suits were always single hook vented while Continental clothes had short side vents. I remember this changed in the mid '60s at Paul Stuart. I could be wrong, but I don't recall side-vented sport jackets either (at least none that I bought in the Madison/44th area).
Regards,
Steven
Steven,
Do you remember if there was any crossover between the continental and natural shoulder looks back then?
Chris
Steve McQueen was no 'Trad', therefore anything he wore wasn't 'Trad'.
It's all about the attitude, see?
Steve had balls.
'Trad' is bollocks.
(I'm loving my new mellow persona...)
t.
Tyto,
Here is the thread I think you were originally referring to, co-incidentally I was upbraided by xcubbies for calling Mcqeen's jacket trad as TL has just mentioned.
http://www.askandyaboutclothes.com/forum/showthread.php?t=48299&highlight=Steve+Mcqueen
Matt,
Who knows whether the actual jacket was sold by CCC, but a similar one supplied by them without the ticket pocket was offered on ebay last year. A trad museum is a very apt description of the shop, but to me also it has a very British feel to it. Maybe this is where they were coming from with the double vent sack.
Cheers
Chris
Last edited by stylestudent (2007-02-20 21:10:00)
Last edited by Horace (2007-02-21 22:23:32)
Fantastic thread.
It appears that Stylestudent and I are contemporaries, my high school and college years extending from the late 50s through the mid 60s. My family had been in men’s retail for at least the two generations before me, and I worked in that business until its demise in early 60s. Thereafter, I sold for a small, decidedly Ivy, men’s shop in my home town in the North Carolina mountains. Our clothing lines were H. Freeman and Southwick, all three button, center vented jackets and plain front, cuffed trousers; and our principal dress shirt line was Gant. We did, however, stock tab collared shirts ( cannot dredge up by whom), and I and others of my ilk wore them interchangeably with our OCBDs. Moreover, apropos the English/Ivy connection, the proprietor of the shop designed/resurrected a true Norfolk jacket, in a couple of different tweeds, which he sold only sporadically in the shop but quite successfully through a small block ad that he ran in the New Yorker.
As for Continental, I recall the cousin of one of my confreres visiting from Miami for the summer of 60 or 61 and sporting very slim cut, shiny fabric pants with extension waist bands, no belt loops and plain bottoms. His shirts were also close fitting with rolled, bandless spread collars and sleeves ending mid-bicep. We boys all liked the dude (as “dude” was used then) but thought his clothes weird in the extreme, especially, and I don’t think I’m dreaming this, one pair of pants that had side zippers. I must acknowledge, however, that he was a big hit with the girls even though he wore nothing made of madras or khaki.
Some really interesting and informative posts here.
Thank you gentlemen!
Because they heard about CCC from the OPH?
Was Robert Kirk always part of CCC? I seem to recall that Robert Kirk was the English goods seller and a separate store, but this is a very dim memory.