What is the big thing with Lesbian chicks and tatts? The one on the left has those meaningless tatts that Kat von D sports to ridiculous lengths

They look like lovely girls and Little Tony approves. HOwever, they are quite different in tone: the one on the left is into the whole retro rockabilly Betty Boop stuff, while the one on the right is more alt. The one on the right has her hand on the other's shoulder, like a man keeping a firm grip on his 'property', even though she's much shorter and it can't be comfortable. If Shooey's speculation is correct, and he's probably not too far off, then the girl is bi and that means she can switch back and forth. (I remember once helping a buddy move apartments and some of his other friends helping with the move were a pair of lesbians: one was the classic butch, the other was a beautiful blonde from whom I got some very friendly vibes; I believe she was a switch hitter but was being dominated by her highly masculine girlfriend; it made me sad in the same way that some weak-willed but nice women are dominated by their boyfriend/husbands.)

Thanks for posting, FXH.

I wonder how dumb you'd have to be to have two fake nylon seams tattooed down the back of your legs?  Dumber than dirt?  Dumber than a bag of gravel?   Smarter than an amoeba, but dumber than a centipede?  It's an interesting question.

Last edited by Maximilien de Robespierre (2011-09-15 22:18:10)

I don't see much Betty Boop on the woman on the left--the figure on her arm looks more like a typical corseted Victorian dominatrix with a whip---although to me, almost everything looks like a corseted Victorian dominatrix with a whip. I wonder why.

I find the fake stocking seams interesting, though with the half-life of a joke.

I'm sure a front view would reveal no tits at all on either.

Ah, youth.

To me, that's just another photograph dispelling all my erotic notions of lesbian bliss which doesn't actually exist outside of certain porn films. And probably a good thing too.