Has it become the "style" to wear shirts untucked. I know for me it's been about 5, 7 years or so, I've gone to untucked. I see old photos or home movies and I always have my shirt tucked in. I'm playing with the kids, in the yard, just back from the gym, and I have my T shirt tucked in to a pair of fleece gym shorts. I look like a dork. God, I waseven tucking in my polo shirt. I would never do that now.
The only time I'm tucking now is if I have a layer on over the shirt. I hate that look- shirt tails hanging from underneath a jacket or sweater.
Even when going out to eat, or a party or church or whatever my shirtails are flying in the breeze.
Is it a generational thing? I think most 20 and 30 somethings would say untucked and most older guys would say tucked. I'm well into the later catagory but I prefer untucked.
Depends really don't it, long polo un-tucked with harrington looks shit, but un-tucked OCBD with shorts looks good. Honestly it is just down to what ever works with what you're wearing. Also I think low-rise and tucked in can look really bad on some people, me included.
I wear my shirts tucked in with jeans or trousers and untucked with shorts. I'd never tuck a polo shirt in. It does seem to be the norm to leave your shirt untucked these days but I aint bothered about the norm.
I reckon you can over think being scruffy, like I said I think it comes down to the fact most people don't wear suits all day so want to dress as smart casual as they can to stand out from the pyjama brigade, by the time you've worn a suit all week though you don't really consider your casual clothes in the same way. The one rule for me is don't have an un-tucked shirt longer than the jacket or coat your wearing. Otherwise it depends what I'm doing to determine how I'm dressed. I prefer the older style of polo with a tail, I usually tuck them in if I'm trying to look smart, if it's a complete lazy day it'd be the last thing on my mind really, I'd probably be creased, un-tucked with no socks. Maybe not now its winter though! Like most thing horses for courses, some people like to always look neater than others. I'm more bothered by colours than whether I look sharp or not. But then when I have to look neat for work I can't stand anything out of place.
Last edited by Oo Bop Sh'bam (2011-10-18 13:59:30)
Depends on how the shirt is cut. Some shirts are cut to be worn out.
Last edited by steve mcqueen fan (2011-10-18 14:35:05)
Depends on the vagaries of the English weather.
I wear a shirt untucked when I am doing laundry or some nasty chore. If I bathed that day and am wearing clean clothes, I tuck in my shirt like a man.
Generally, with the exception of some madras shirts and polos, always tucked in.
What about a Pendleton?
You mean the heavy board shirts and shirt jackets?
No one in their right mind would even think of tucking them in!
Their bds like the Sir Pendletons is another topic, but I guess they're not what D&F (welcome back BTW!!!) had in mind....
Oxford shirts almost always tucked in. Untucked feels unnatural. About the only time I do that is with shorts (and yes, I do wear them with boat shoes). I don't usually tuck in polos with long pants. Sometimes I do with shorts...especially for tennis/squash...I like not having the shirt flapping around while I run around out there.
I would say that my generation is more likely to untuck in college, but out and about in the city I see a lot of people my age (20s) tucked in, even into jeans.
Popover shirts I find work well untucked, but unless i'm at home with my feet up, i would always wear my shirt tucked in, but never a polo shirt, for me that's up there with the tucked in jumpers of the casuals in the 80s.
have always been a tucker, but with casual workwear style shirts (chambray etc) it looks better untucked. but if the shirt ends past halfway on your butt cheek, it looks sloppy. I've had couple shirts shortened that I wear untucked, because they were too long. But it does seem that tucking in is becoming more popular opposed to 3 years ago
Yesterday I went out in a Madras J Simon's shirt, untucked. I rarely do this but it felt good. I also went sockless with boat shoes. I rarely do this but it felt good. My chore jacket is now my favourite. As I approach 70 I'm going through the change.
^ A good look I reckon Robbie. If it feels good it probably looks good.
I used to only ever tuck in. I was into much slimmer cut shirts back then. Then Britpop came around and everyone went untucked and a bit baggier for a while. Tucked in suddenly seemed very square.
Now I'll tuck in if it's cooler and I'm wearing anything over the shirt or polo.
I'll never tuck anything into shorts. You might as well add grey socks and sandals if you're going to do that. Madras shorts with white socks and loafers isn't something I could carry off.
I've been looking at some of these Japanese and Korean guys that have a great look. Turned up denim, khakis or fatigue pants. Sockless. Loafers and a big billowing white or light blue ocbd untucked with shirt tails blowing around. Often undone with a white or navy T underneath. I couldn't do it with the fatigue pants but it seems to work for them.
All a matter of context, confidence (in fact, a GTH attitude). The Japanese do their look nicely but possibly do not have the shaved head/sleeve tattoo brigade roaming around ever ready to take the piss (or do they?). Madras shorts with white socks and loafers is an excellent look but - my word - bags of chutzpah is required. I did the seersucker shorts/sockless/loafers or white Sebago deck shoes with untucked polo shirt some dozen or so years ago. No-one (to my knowledge) batted an eyelid. My Madras jacket caused heads to turn back in 2008. But - fuck 'em. TRS isn't the only one who'll resist going gentle into that good night. Ivy is a MOOD. He said so.
I may attempt the Jack Sheldon/'Go, Buddy' look soon: simply a long-sleeve Madras shirt (can be a modest spread collar) with chinos (poly/cotton L.L.Bean may work best, believe it or not) and Pro-Keds. Quite likely sockless.