Stay off them, Shooey. We love your crazy outback ass just the way it is.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2011-12-16 06:37:53)
Shooman, seriously now. Read and learn from me, painful as that may seem.
I have been around a little bit longer than you, so I have seen a lot of these alternative medical fads come and go.
One of this very forum's (Ivy) icons, Steve McQueen, when dying of cancer went in search of Laetrile to Mexico. Laetrile was an extract of apricot that fit into the nutritional healing nascent scene. Well, it didn't work. But since we're inside a computer let's talk of another Steve (Jobs) who wasted precious time with a nutritional cure to a variety of pancreatic cancer that is otherwise curable with early intervention. That did not work either. So what works?
The point here is not to denigrate natural remedies or nutritional cures but to point out the differences between "alternative" therapies and "conventional" medicine. It is the winnowing out process of "what works", AKA, the "peer reviewed process"
A lot of the medical establishment drugs (digitalis, atropine, penicillin, etc) are found in nature. What makes them "conventional" rather than "alternative" therapy is the fact that they went through a process of peer reviewed statistically sound trials that were published, then either refuted or confirmed by subsequent trials. Many other "alternative", as well as "scientific establishment therapies" have started with great hope on the road of trial verification. If they fail this process they fall into the dustbin of medical history like Laetril did, and a myriad other compounds evil pharma generated and lost money on.
The fact that some drugs have side effects is well known. The decision to use a drug with risks entails a careful weighing of the risk/benefit ratio. This act of weighing the risk benefit ratio of anything is the reason you spend years after medical school in residency training, early on watching many others make those judgements, later on making those judgements yourself under supervision. It is just a tad more valid than internet learning, which I also do, by the way. Still, being humans, we fail at times. And yes, a perfectly good medicine can kill in the wrong circumstance.
Your categorical renunciation of one of humanity's greatest achievements (reductions of morbidity and mortality rates, expansion of life span) falls within the inane heading of this thread. I find it more inane, and inexplicable, that I took the time to respond to your posts and if others laugh at my expense it is well deserved. Everybody agrees when seeing an argument between a sane person and a crazy one, the humor lies in seeing the sane one unwittingly descend to the level of the crazy one. So it is that from such a vulnerable point I offer these words to Shooman, out of kindness, concern, and respect for his abundant good qualities.
"Your crazy outback ass just the way it is" may be easy to love or tolerate from afar. But is full of confusion, misplaced anger, more than a hint of paranoia, and interferes with navigating through normal social intercourse. This of course would be passable, were you not so hungry for approval, and desperate to belong.
Last edited by Chévere (2011-12-16 16:20:07)
As I am a staunch Catholic I am deeply conflicted by this, but Satan's posts make me quiver.
And his avatar rocks.
Last edited by Chévere (2011-12-16 16:55:26)
Last edited by Popeye Doyle (2011-12-16 18:05:31)
Last edited by The_Shooman (2011-12-16 19:26:46)
This is becoming a snooze fest, could someone please make fun of the axers over atandy's.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2011-12-17 00:58:54)
Last edited by Sammy Ambrose (2011-12-17 02:22:38)
Regardless of whether it is the Big 3 or not, dressing standards have gotten extraordinarily casual across the board. I’m so over beards, distressed this, and vintage that. Most companies barely even have a defined casual dress code. My exceptional sales management instructor and author, Steven W. Martin, at USC had mentioned to not wear ties anymore on typical C-level B2B sales calls (typically with West Coast software and networking companies). So, my recent foray into traditional, dress, and Ivy style is rebellious and reactionary. After I started wearing bow ties and putting a little care in to what I wear, I have been garnering a lot of attention and compliments from my peers and instructors. It’s been my “cowcatcher”, “peacock effect”, and “pattern disruption”. Enough dumbing down for me… it’s time to dress smart and stand out as an individual
http://www.ivy-style.com/the-game-wtf-happened.html