Has anyone else noticed the alarming amount of school girls posted on Wasp 101, the old devil is giving Woody Allen a run for his money...
http://wasp101.blogspot.co.uk/search?updated-max=2012-04-17T00:48:00-04:00&max-results=10
Last edited by Oo Bop Sh'bam (2012-04-23 13:17:13)
Ah in Australia we refer to them as 'Wankers'.
He is a man with no shoulders or chest, and very big hips. No matter what lengths he goes to i don't ever think he is going to look good in a suit. He is cursed with a terrible frame. For me that is the most difficult frame to fit for a rtw suit.
Lots of pseudo-philosophical BS from Costi - http://thelondonlounge.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&p=63460&sid=82c1fdc5aafe954ff4e7dd1734e92078#p63460 - I often wonder if he is trolling his own site.
Christ, I thought I was a hoho. I was merely trying to point out the objective of the ego, and the repetition of behaviour it produces in order to seek a reward. I'm not really sure what he is on about though, he sounds cleverer than me.
Last edited by Oo Bop Sh'bam (2012-04-24 16:22:45)
Depends on how much of that Perry I've had. I mean I think what I, and maybe he is trying to get at is quite interesting, but I think it loses its point and meaning if you're trying to sound clever for it, because then you just feeding that ego again. The point of knowledge should be to gain further freedom really, not just look knowledgeable. The ego is a trap. And I'm not sure it can be easily qualified. But for me personally there is a clear distinction in it. If I didn't need distracting a lot of the time I'd probably have better control of it. What ever gives you that reward gets looked at as being positive, even if it is damaging, that is the power of the ego in the most simple terms I think.
Last edited by Oo Bop Sh'bam (2012-04-24 16:56:20)
You've given me an idea.