Last edited by formby (2012-04-26 14:56:30)
The fascinating thing about Sig, Uovo is that here is a guy who didn't own a bespoke suit three years ago. Then he had an off-Row suit made and bought a pair of brown Cleverley's that had been made for a bankrupted fund-trader. After that, he bamboozled his way into Anda Rowland's den (that's really weird, that is) and blagged some abominably bad suits off her; started writing for The Rake and The Financial Times (?) and now for G n Q, as a major style icon and passes himself off as a style consultant to tailors and customers alike.
It is, though, despite all that can be laughed about and sneered at, a matter of true wonder that such a lanky, bald, bearded, over-earnest geek can have convinced so many people that a sow's ear really is a silk purse. He is a fascinating phenomenon and sheds light on the shocking inability of so many moderns instinctively to be able to discriminate between beauty and ugliness.
Still, for all that, he really is a total arsehole (a clothing quack) and I too use his blog as a way in which to send the fatty acids in my bloodstream scurrying for cover.
Last edited by Reckless Reggie (2012-04-27 15:44:36)
Surely, it depends on what the compliment is for: if another man on the sidewalk says ''That's a well-cut suit'', that's just fine. But if he says ''Ooh I do like the way the color of the flowers in your tie are picked out in your pocket square'' then it is time to hurry off to an urgent appointment - unless, of course, you are Simon Crompton, because then you will get some color co-ordination cards out and start examining the point.
Not sure that a love of clothes is primarily a feminine characteristic - Mohammad Ali, Chris Eubank, Al Capone, Edward VII, George V, Winston Churchill, FD Roosevelt, Napoleon, George IV, A J Drexel Biddle - what a mix - all had a love of clothes and none of them is\was at all effeminate, It depends on the man and the depth of the 'love' and how much fussing and frigging goes into the exercise of dressing and, finally, whether the overall effect is Brummellesque elegance or a Cromptonesque dog's dinner.
However, it is interesting to mark that, just as the definition of marriage is about to be changed in Britain to embrace civil unions between same-sex partners, most men still probably fear being tagged as feminine or effeminate! Strange society that we live in, ter be sure, ter be sure, it is at that, Interesting too that, presumably, Elton John's civil partner will, presumably, become 'Lady John' wah! ha! ha!
Last edited by Reckless Reggie (2012-04-29 08:00:34)
Poor old Crompton gets some stick, doesn't he? Apart from the fact that he damned my first book with faint praise, he seems hardly to justify the equivalence of nativity of Andyland.