http://yalebooks.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/tales-of-a-radical-conformist-g-p-gaul-on-ivy-style/
'Ivy Guru'-hood is his.
- Which he'd be the first to dismiss !
I think he's the most intellegent writer on the subject bar none. Everything is considered & meant.
Is 'cum' the kind of word that should be used on a family forum? It's just like having Cheeky posting again.
I love the cut of the one on the left, any idea on what it is?
I like the concept of 'Radical Conformism' very much.
In my England Ivy was very much under the radar. I hope it still is a bit, depending on where you are & who you're with. That was a great attraction to me too.
It was MY thing and I was initially very tight lipped about what I was up to. Suddenly becoming very tidy after the usual English scruffy Trad childhood. Which again made me different.
Without being deep and meaningful (when have I ever?) I probably felt myself to be different first & then found a way to express it that was right for me.
Last edited by Hard Bop Hank (2012-06-26 01:49:32)
- Sorry, that's the one on the right !
I think the look John describes would still cause a certain amount of disquiet in certain circles. I think it's great - for that time - but I wouldn't want to do it now (not that I was doing it then, you understand, I was dressing - albeit with many subtle variations - much as I'm dressing now), on the basis that it looks too - erm - officious? (I think Jason Jules was rocking it even then, wasn't he?) Having said that - and I realise I'm not explaining myself too coherently - that tweed/wingtip look is far more interesting than your standard G9/buttondown/Levis/red socks/Weejuns. That's just a naff uniform.
The casual, lazy, unimaginative side. I saw a guy at JS' the other week buying a Harrington. Overweight, square, red in the face, somewhat embarrassed, his wife holding his coat. He could have been in C&A.
I think JP and Jim are people who understand the beauty of the clothes, as well as stir up the emotion of them. A double pronged assault.