l've gotta say, Church's shoos are really pretty special. Sure they are stitched in an open channel, sure they are gemmed, and sure they use grain corrected leather and painted leather on many models, but these shoos are really very special goodyear welted shoos. Church's really make a statement because they aren't fancy and slick like their other English goodyear welted brothers, but they rise to the top because they are a great no nonsense mans shoo that are the tanks of the goodyear world. The Church's have that beefed up look (even on single soles) and have that special black colour that few black shoos can imitate. The shoos make a man not look like he cares about footwear, yet they make a statement more than most shoos because of the shape and special look. But not only that...the thing which l love is these shoes are so strong...extra goes into the making of these shoos over the other midend English goodyear...more materials are used and they make a more solid shoe (thicker leather and linings and probably other good stuff). They aren't flimsy feeling like many goodyears, they are meat for the feet...perfect for big bossman to call the shots and really be the man without distracting others with his footwear.
l can well understand the higher prices charged for Church's, they are truely worth the extra. $900 is a good price for these shoos. The only thing l don't like is sometimes the finish can get damaged and the shoe upper is damaged forever.
My C&J wear badly and feel flimsy, and l don't feel the benchgrades have near the life in them compared to my Church's. My Church's on the other hand feel great and look great. l always enjoy my days that little bit extra when wearing them. For goodyear, they are my ultimate experience. Now...of course they don't even begin to compare to the solidness and strength and delight of the hand welted shoo, that is another world entirely, but for a machine made mass produced product (5,000 pairs made a day) they are simply divine and go the extra mile like very few other shoos.
Church's are pure mans shoos with class (the mainline).
----------------------------------------------------------------
Alright fellas, lets talk about what you love about English goodyear welted shoos. Lets talk about brands and why you love them.
Regards: The Shooman.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2012-08-09 21:57:04)
They are right by Northampton rail station. The factory shop is always worth a visit. Ring first if you have a size and model in mind.
Leatherman was the most interesting and informed poster on Church's. I think he finally got tired and knocked it all on the head.
I would say Loake are king of the beaters - far more affordable.
Trickers are a good beater shoe - cheaper than the others and very sturdy.
Fosters best for me though as the last is closest to my foot shape.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2012-08-10 04:46:58)
Shooey, when it comes to Doctoring and drinking grass, I will have to cogitate deeply and subtly before following your advice. But my next pair of shoes will be Church's and I thank you for that.
Last edited by Brideshead (2012-08-16 05:44:25)
hi all, new to this forum (came upon it by accident) after reading a few others and have to say its refreshing to read some of the views on here (the bespoke disasters one had me in stiches). i have to say after reading SF .. i did start to think that maybe i wasnt 'getting it' on looking at some of the wierd sh8t people there wear ..
interesting you talk about your experience of churchs being good as on SF they are HATED with a vengence, they are berated for being poor quality after the prada takeover, but from what ive observed they are decent shoes. Crockett and Jones are hailed as the king of shoes which has fuelled interest in C&J and im sure done wonders for their bottom line (i believe they are opening a new shop in knightsbridge).
would be interested in more views & experience with churchs choes .. i think the fact that a lot of shoes they make are v conservative goes to making them hated on SF.
mike.
Yes, they are similar to women in that they don't appreciate the finer points of footwear, and they have a very varrow view of the context of footwear (they see a small group of footwear as exceptable and trash the rest as junk). Their views of shoe style is very narrow, and they always appreciate the look of a shoe over substance. In other words, their shoe views are basically `shoes101'. Another problem is that most of them don't really think at all when it comes to footwear, they just follow what is popular and never question it. There are a couple of good shoe posters over there, but most of what the good posters say go over most people's head.
Shoes take a long time to understand well, but once you've put in the hours observing them over a period of time they become very easy to understand. That's the other problem...many people at S.F think they are `shoo-experts'.
So much goes into a shoe that it's incredible. Eg,
* various shoe constructions
* the building of the uppers: - special patterns for the lining and sometimes middle lining to get a stronger result.
* special needles to sew the uppers with different patterns for various reasons
* various leather qualitites
Last edited by The_Shooman (2012-08-25 21:16:45)
Another thing where the igents always got confused was with grain corrected leather. They wrongly assumed that all grain corrected leather was poor quality, but nothing could be further from the truth. Many people love the high shine of grain corrected and want a high quality goodyear shoe, so they choose Church's instead of low quality grain corrected Loake. You can always tell a high quality grain corrected leather by looking at the back of the leather. The finer and more smooth the back, the better it is. The leather which is rough (in the back) and has chunks hanging off it is low quality. Not all grain corrected leather has faults, but leather suppliers grain correct the finish because people want it that way. But some companies will grain correct leather to cover up faults, but that is not the motivation for all companies.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2012-08-26 09:39:51)
Amen Shooey.
Gemming failures happen and do so alot more often then anyone lets on. Gemming failure is especially endemic for people who perspire alot (ask me how I know). Bear in mind that this is also heavily dependant on the type/quality/state of cement/adhesive/glue that was used to attach the canvas gemming to the inner sole. Sometimes it isn't even the glue that fails but the actual inner sole that basically delaminates because either synthetics (cellulose/fiber board, etc) or really cheap splits are used as inner sole. So what happens is that you have the intact canvas rib that is still properly stuck to a chank of the inner sole that ripped of.
Personally I am still fond of all cement construction. Basically you can get/use some exceptional cements that will hold on and last very long. This combined with good quality inner soles and uppers can make for very comfortable and well made all cement shoes. That said, resoling will always be problematic as when you remove the worn outer sole there is always a chance that certain portions will still have some strongly adhered cement that will invariably rip a bit of the shoe upper (folded over) that is is attached to. You can easily get tearing along the sole to upper transition if not careful.
Another thing that I am amazed is folks inability to distinguish between leather grades or to confuse them just because of the shoe brands cache. Basically you can get alot of medium quality shoes that use leathers of qualities asociated with the top makers. Also why the hate for corrected grain yet all this love for cordovan. Especially cordovan love from folks who don't realy seam to have any experience with it.
Also, there never seems to be any discussion on the quality of threads used in goodyear or handwelted, but this is very important. I have some handwelted shoes where the only failure point is the threading. Most often this is hemp or linen and is basically just decaying because was cheap/poor quality to begin with. Nowadays it probably is impossible to find good quality long staple hemp or linen - no matter how properly it was waxed. Better to use good quality nylon or polyester thread even though it is not historically how it was done. Sometimes the passage of time forces you to use new materials because noone knows the proper old recipes or the ingredients aren't available anymore.
posted a link from a shoe snob blog below trashing churchs shoes .. and below that is a comment in the Q&A bit of the article .. argument against church seems to be the infamous binder leathers (although they offer many choices from my observations), new 'fashionable' lasts & their new 'fashionable' ranges of shoes.
http://the-shoe-snob.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/downfall-of-churchs-shoes.html
Justin FitzPatrick, "The Shoe Snob" said...
Ari - I don't know how much exposure you have to their shoes, but I see them almost everyday. Their classics are no longer what they used to be. They try to keep the design classic, but I have seen the shape of their new lasts, and they are trendy, using book binder (cheap & glossy) leather and are doing more than trying to attract the fashion crowd. They are turning it into a fashion brand. In the window of one of their stores here they have a full brogue that has spikes in each brogue....that's excessive (and something that Prada does), and not something a "classic" brand would ever do. Also you forget that I am shining other peoples shoes all of the time, and yes while I have not purchased any of their shoes as of current, I am constantly being exposed to them, and the decline in quality that I see and touch.... I say these things because I used to be a big fan, as they made one of the nicest full brogues of all time (that they don't do anymore) and i find it a shame to see where it has gone. I don't take stabs just for the sake of it, and don't say that someone's brand has declined in quality unless i have seen it, felt it and experienced it.
Justin Fitzgerald (ShoeSnob) would know. He shines them and he knows how to make them and apprenticed with the late Stefano Bemer.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2012-08-27 20:55:23)
Last edited by The_Shooman (2012-08-27 22:10:53)