I have already voiced my dissension to this theorem.
Yes and no. I do think I reserve impress for different uses, or maybe have a different connotation in that use anyway, but I also think that there are more complex things happening, or at least that it can be broken down into smaller components of which trying to impress is one.
All that said, I get the biggest satisfaction from being able to execute the vision in my minds eye, and that covers a lot of ground, sartorialy speaking. So mostly myself I guess.
Everybody.
Girls: obvious
Guys: so they know I am their superior in all facets of life except physical prowess, which deficiency people like me have concocted prisons, policemen, and draconian penal codes.
I also dress to impress everybody.
While I may wish to show people that I am their superior in matters of taste and elegance, I am not megalomaniac enough to proclaim myself superior in "all facets of life." Hell, anyone who can overhaul an automobile engine is way superior to me in that facet of life.
I've just got an image in my mind. I try to attain it, and in the rare case I look in the mirror and I've achieved it, I actually impress myself. This makes me happy and I feel like the exuberance I exude will bolster my personality, which is how I really want to win people over. It's not the clothes per se. They're a means to an end.
Last edited by Sammy Ambrose (2013-05-03 22:16:32)
I use to think that everyone would be able to read the signs and the sharpness of image with its sartorial message and flair would be self evident for all to see. But now I realise like any language, not everyone can read or understand it. Not everyone is capable of recognising a bespoke masterpiece from something off the peg at Marks & Spencers, or the perfect Brooks boom period collar roll as oppossed to the effete modern Ralph Lauren one and quite frankly not everyone cares. In fact most people don't.
Primary then, I am dressing for myself. Certainly not my wife, as she would have me dressed as a Prada-boy or in Armani jeans with long pointy shoes.
So the question is, does this make me narcisstic? No, I don't think so. But I am certainly dressing to impress myself above others and on the odd occasion someone gets it, then that's a bonus to me.
I dress for a variety of reasons, here are my thoughts in order of importance:
First I dress in classic bespoke clothing because I am the boss and want to look the part. The clothing in this sense is a uniform that differentiates me from my employees who for the most part are casual. Secondly, as indicated by others above I have an image of myself and i enjoy attempting to achieve it. This is purely for personal pleasure and self confidence. I am sure that when I have these attributes it rubs off on those around me. Or alternatively when I am upset and lack confidence, there are negative effects on those around me. Thirdly, I enjoy the bespoke process and even if one could find the almost perfect RTW, the flaws become intolerable to me, in this sense I am a perfectionist. With bespoke I am more willing to except the flaws as something that can be fixed next time with the tailor or shirtmaker. Fourthly, I aim to please my wife and prior to meeting her girls in general. Since being married this consideration has fallen in importance. But my wife is still definitely a consideration and will often comment positively or negatively. I know what she likes and try to avoid what she actively dislikes. Fifthly, if someone else compliments my taste or elegance, this is a pleasant experience that I enjoy, but it is a small consideration. Finally, using my tailor, in my city, does serve as an identifier to others in the know, but this is of limited utility these days, maybe a generation or two ago, but bespoke is now so rare, even in the social circles which would patronize bespoke, the ability to identify these markers seems to be dwindling and is therefore of limited utility or interest to me.
l try dressing well because l enjoy it and want to look the part of being respectable and a solid man of society. l am not sure l dress to impress, but l think l do dress to make a positive impression.
l am amazed at the number of people who are happy to walk around in rags and bad shoos, these people look for excuses to dress well.
A funny story.....there was a workplace l used to be at where various folks were required to wear a suit everyday, but these guys were typical aussie blokes who hated dressing up. When you would don the suit for special meeting the joke always was "are you going to a funeral mate?". The guys which would joke around about the funerals were the owners who basically walked around the place in tracksuit pants and sneakers and even did important meetings dressed that way. But you don't get to that position without having 30 years to establish an excellent client base of people who know you well. BUT...it just shows you that developing good business relationships is even more important than clothing when a person is important enough to be chased by clients.
l think most people dress to impress because they aren't that important. If you are `the man' it shouldn't matter what you wear (public office excepted). If Donald Trump wore a tracksuit and sneakers to work l am sure his business wouldn't suffer either; he has experience and an identity and people are going to want a part of him no matter how he dresses. Reputation at excellenece in work is everything, but if you are building your status then l guess a suit is needed in most cases until you become `the man'. l have an uncle who wears old army clothes or old shabby polyestor 1970's suits to his law firm and meets with clients, but he does well because he has the reputation. When you see how good and professional some men are in the workplace you quickly forget about the clothes, and if they write you off because of your clothing, oh well, there are always more clients who will come if your work is good.
If people chase you, you can do what you like if your work is good. If you chase clients you are probably best to wear a suit until you become a somebody. Still, l wish people would wear more suits and sportscoats, they look nice.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2013-05-04 00:26:59)
Last edited by Sammy Ambrose (2013-05-04 01:28:06)
Last edited by The_Shooman (2013-05-04 02:48:41)
“A man should look as though he chose his clothes with intelligence, put them on with care, and then forget all about them” - Hardy Amies.
Excrement!
You are always concious of your clothes and the effect they are having on your audience. For one, this feedback loop is one of the ways in which you learn how to dress well and appropriately.
Clothing forum's are odd places, allowing a view of one of the many dualities of man's psyche.
And, it is at times an amusing vista.
Pedro.
Last edited by Sammy Ambrose (2013-05-04 04:23:07)
1. Women
2. I'm a reporter. I bother people for a living, often in person. If I am wearing a jacket and tie I believe it sends a message: "I'm a professional and I take you, Norma Smedley, seriously, as well as your tireless promotion of the Third Annual Hiram Smedley Frankfurter Eating Festival and Crop Circle Orgy.
If the subject is squirrelly, at all, the coat and tie is intimidating, which is usually good. A nervous answer is usually an honest one.
3. With a mug like mine, I need all the help I can get (see #1)
4. Dressing up is a chance to be young, loud and snotty again. I'm often the only man in the room with a necktie on, never mind shoes. I stand out today as much as I did in 1978, with a crazy haircut and a tee shirt featuring a swastika in a circle with a line through it (as in "no smoking") and the legend "Nazi Punks Fuck Off."
An honest mistake I assure you. It would be unwise to misquote something that could be so easily checked.
In your zeal to demonstrate your googling prowess, you forgot to deal with my further points, though.
As for confusing the possessive for the plural. I blame the Blackberry.
Pedro.
I think there is also a sense of 'Don't Let The Bastards Grind You Down'.
I used to get perfectly decent shoes and clothes from the High Street. First leather shoes disappeared. Then overcoats.
Last edited by Sammy Ambrose (2013-05-04 05:22:14)
Last edited by Sammy Ambrose (2013-05-04 05:39:15)