To be honest - I pretty much loved everything he did up until around the end of TSC, I've liked a lot of his solo stuff too. From a personal point of view however, I think it's Wellers very admirable desire to evolve and not retread old ground, that has unfortunately resulted in his poorest output. Having been a fan since I was 14, I have to admit his music does nothing for me now - I bought 'Sonik Kicks' on the day it was released 18 months ago and it's still in the cellophane. Got quite excited a few years ago when he stated that 'wake up the nation' was heavily influenced by Broadcast and was going to be the new 'Sound Affects ' - only to find it was another dull rehash of his previous album. That said, I still have a lot of time for him and have come to realise that I don't have to slavishly pretend to enjoy everything he does to be a fan of the man.
As for the lack of discernible youth subcultures, think 4F has raised some very salient points regarding the times we're living in economically. In addition, given that our concept of the 'teenager' is a relatively modern/post war construct - perhaps it's all played out anyway and we've evolved past that stage of development as a society ?
Last edited by chuck power (2013-11-22 05:44:18)
A lot of youth cults came into being because young people were insufficiently marketed to i.e. all that was on offer to them did not appeal, so they created their own style. The early mods may be the best example of this. Young people had full employment, almost all lived at home, and yet there was so little for them to spend their disposable income on. (We can be certain the likes of local tailors, mohair manufacturers, Sue Records and the Scene Club did not launch some sophisticated combined marketing campaign to create modism.) Nowadays young people are bombarded with so much constant, highly effective marketing, there is no way they can reject all that to create their own world.
Not that I actually know much about young people. I don't find them particularly interesting.
Maybe we are at the end of history, youthculturewise. Everything has been done before, in some form or other. I may be wrong, but for me the latest real innovation in music was house/techno. That was new. Since then, all I can see are variations of things which were there before.
What I meant with that I tend to think that it is positive that this phenomenon does not exist anymore was that all these tribes brought a lot of violence. You got beaten up just because you "were" an xyz.
Hep, you are right. What gets lost is the rupture, the change of things. That really is a pity.
Also, maybe, people do not want to stick out that much anymore? A few days ago, I saw a young woman: she had some rolled-up old jeans which were neither slim nor wide, heavysoled creepers, and some monstrosity of shapeless parka / winter overcoat which she obviously was wearing inside out (although it's whacketywack). Hair was short, pixiecut. The clothes were not expensive, but she obviously chose them very carefully to achieve a look she wanted. Likely, she was some sort of "fashion blogger", but she was the last individual to really stick out which I saw in ages. Maybe the experimenting got lost? I often think that people want to buy into something today. Hey, that's cool, where can I buy the outfit?
A few years ago, there was this short-lived phenomenon of kids who made these jumping dance moves. Did that have a name? I think, that came close to a youthculture. I hated the music, I hated the looks, I hated the stupid dance. Actually, they hit the spot. We are the ones the youth will rebel against.
Last edited by Axelist (2013-11-22 06:30:44)
I think the shock value is crucial Hep. Pink mohicans, tattoos even ear-rings have all been vilified in their time. Nothing shocks anymore though, apart from killing people and even that's getting to a point where it is just a normal thing that goes on. Awful times really.
I am not advocating murder here folks!!!
But when its in the news you're shocked, but not surprised.
... when I arrived back things had changed. The big thing was soul music and football violence with the dress code of Lois jeans frayed at the bottom desert boots and knits Pringles etc.
Armchaired himself wrote this a year ago. Unfortunately he seems to have changed his mind since then.
Last edited by chuck power (2013-11-22 08:19:34)
More from the same show - (ish)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UQmY57qrfw
wasn't really scoffing CP, just thought it amusing : )
They were very popular along with the Shelley's bowling shoes .
Post-modernist / consumerist society has in many ways killed off youth cults.
Clothes are not the signifier's they once were.
An emo kid is as likely to come from a middle-class background as they are a working class one. Their clothes tell you nothing about their background.
And this was my point with Topsticher when he as camping it up about 'class' this and 'class' that. He was evoking the rules of a game that is no longer played.
Last edited by Taylor McIntyre (2013-11-23 00:24:21)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2512013/Schoolgirls-sent-home-classes-having-exaggerated-teddy-boy-haircuts.html
Im pretty sure thats one of the proclaimers on the left and not a schoolgirl.
that haircut is a bit of an epidemic with the young fellas, they call it the Fusey haircut, its a Joey Essex thing apparently. So my ladyfriend's daughter tells me.
I may have mentioned this before, but it really is worth taking the time to read, for entertainment even if you don't believe the whole premise
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr93.html
an interesting look at hippies and California and the military-industrial complex- "The Strange But Mostly True Story Of Laurel Canyon"
He's pretty beefy for a vegetarian.