Mick wins hands down for outfits in Adelaide - in the seersucker(??) suit even beating Charlie  - until you look down at the dreadful sneakers and pooled up trousers. I don't get it - he makes an effort and can afford anything - why not just look down and fix it all.

But isn't the stone's  demographic the (well)  over 50's? Nothing youthful except perhaps perennially immature.  I used to like,  nay,  love,  the stones, but Exile aside,  I abandoned them years ago.  Mainly because they were stuck and not in a good way.  For a brilliant pair of rock/pop writers the Glimmer Twins to continue to come up with unselfconcious misogynist lyrics consistently speaks /spoke of lack of effort and/or intelligence.

Anyway back to clothes,  Mick could have worn white bucks,  saddle shoes,  correspondents  or fuck  it,  even tasty white sneakers and fulfilled all the hip criteria.  He choose not too.  Just like the music.  No wonder Charlie stays aloof.

I think Micks left the hanger in.

Anyone that knows London will know the love a mixed demographic has of seizure inducing trainers... from Notting Hill mothers to the kids playing football under the Westway to some 40 something mug working in media teaming them.with a casual jacket, I think Micks well in fashion there.

^And lot's of male feminists too!

What a wonderful, diverse and tolerant place it is, ideal to promote the core British values and identity which I was very refreshed to hear on Sky News this morning is all to with being tolerant to other religions, homosexuals and....well, that's all they could come up with!

He obviously does give a flying proverbial or otherwise he wouldn't be touring and making himself available for photo-shoots!