Last edited by Gomez (2007-11-10 06:51:16)
IMHO he did not write anything worth reading for the last 30 or so years.
Wilde once wrote that biography lends new terror to death. I think nowadays it's an obituary in the Daily Telegraph that lends the terror.
Last edited by Voltaire's Bastard (2007-11-10 09:30:00)
Yes - his loss as simply one of the figureheads of a certain age and style is as worth mourning as his talent as a writer. I am sure that there was a substantial amount of fascinating oral history that went down the tubes with him, sadly.
Last edited by Gomez (2007-11-10 09:52:51)
Why Norman Mailer mattered:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1682741,00.html
Last edited by Gomez (2007-11-10 12:21:59)
Norman Mailer's era was when Playboy actually did have articles worth reading.
Mailer seemed to define "curmudgeon" more than most.
(That is a very nice sport jacket, in the photo.)
TV
On a human level, he was a total prick. One of my ex's worked for his publisher, so we shared a few meals with him. Obnoxious, with a capital O. Sorry to speak poorly of those passed. Mea culpa.
I've only cared to read the Naked and the Dead and the essay on the hipster. I think maybe a few other things. Some interviews. I don't know that he can reasonably be said to be in the same league as Bellow and Updike, among others.
I think Mailer was a much better essayist than novelist. His later novels bring a new definition to the word turgid. His essays, however, can be very exciting; I still remember reading "Superman At The Supermart" in 1960 Esquire, a brilliant portrayal of the JFK phenomenon.