TRS - our Gibson - refers to this state of being on occasion: and rightly so. Nothing to be ashamed of. It possibly gives a firmer grasp of The Look and what it entails in Europe than any other approach.
To be handled with care and discretion, though.
The avoidance of appearing 'dowdy'.
Now, in spite of this notion being dismissed fairly recently, I still believe that the definitive book on, yes, 'Mod', has yet to be written. Call it 'Jewish Ivy'. Call it anything but 'Mods!' It's all been touched upon in a number of books but some on here years ago, like Alex Roest, did a pretty decent job on certain aspects of the scene in certain parts of London. Anyway: Gee, Lou, Marc Feld, Bilgorri, gaggia, 'Absolute Beginners' (and the others of that trilogy?), Roger Mayne, Tubby Hayes, Fellini, the American serviceman, Lucky Strike, Raymond Loewy, East Coast, West Coast, Chet, imported bebop, dark glasses, the beret, Belmondo... Not exactly 'Ivy' as defined by our Mr. Simons but all part of 'the influential factor'. And profoundly none igent.
This is a book that will probably never now be written. Why? Apathy and indifference. Not on the part of any potential authors (and few qualify) but that of the intended recipients. Not us of course.
How far back, though, would research have to take any prospective author? How major a part would 'Ivy League' play? Would it be necessary to go all the way back to the first appearance of the sack, to repeat the oft-told story about the button-down, the also well-known story about the penny loafer? Or would it be better to begin in, say, Soho just after the war and feed into it from there? I don't know.
AFS
I love all the things you’ve pulled together and not a parka or scooter in sight.
Add to the list Georgie Fame, Lambert Hendricks and Ross, Fiat 500, Art Blakey doing the soundtrack to Liason Dangerous. Ronnie Scott as both musician and club opener. Archer Street and young British musicians joining Geraldo’s Navy to visit Manhattan.
Thanks, Alvey, much appreciated. Only J.P.Gaul could probably tackle this with any kind of credibility. Love the additions. How could I have missed out Georgie and Ronnie Scott? So glad my Dad made it to the original club, if only the once. I have a great black and white of Lambert, Hendricks and Ross hanging up on the stairs. One of these days you must come and visit.
We also need great designers to your list.Everything from Swedish furniture to the Pan Am logo. Bill Bernbach needs to be front and centre.
Satirists should be included too.
Not to sure about artists are they too much out of the everyday experience?
Everything Alvey says has absolute validity.
The Jewish/American/Italian/Soho/gay influences must always be emphasized - but this could lead to an interesting debate in itself.
Vestiges of Modernism can certainly be picked up on the current Chiltern Street website, albeit in a slightly contrived manner.
If, however, I wear a soft-shouldered corduroy jacket with imported Levis and white sneakers it's a direct reference/homage back to a certain time and place: NYC, circa 1959-60. But it's only a self-conscious attempt to recreate a mood - which of course exists only inside my own head.
So be it.
John Simons was (still is) a visionary. I would take an educated guess that a lot of dissatisfied/disillusioned Mods sooner or later found their way to one of his shops - and thus returned to sanity, creativity, aspiration, good manners, curiosity about food, drink, design, art, architecture, music, the wider world around them.
But it takes some thinking about. And that rules out the majority.
To me an interest in clothes is usually accompanied by an eye for detail. You notice little things. The width of a collar, the texture of a knitted tie, the fit of a jacket. You may not be able to articulate the thinking behind it or rationalise why you even notice these things but it's inherent in who you are. That eye for detail often expands into other areas. Certain visuals will appeal, be they graphic design, furniture, architecture or your environment.
For many this remains a latent interest. But for the few, probably found on this forum, they start to pull-together the various strands into something a bit more cohesive. We are all different and certain things will resonate more strongly than others.
^ Right. I began to get interested in ergonomics and develop a critical eye for design. I began to take a stronger interest in writers like Ian Nairn, Geoffrey Fletcher and Richard Cobb. I also began to pay more attention to 1930s Hollywood: look at the sets, the ambience of movies like 'Dames' or 'A Day At The Races'. I'd already studied writers like William Carlos Williams and Wallace Stevens but was able to move onto Cummings. Then - art. Ellsworth Kelly became important. Hockney - who I'd always admired - possibly more so. Not much of this would have happened had I not begun to know more about fabric and texture. The little things I guess I'd already begun to notice by reading Blake. Also W.H.Davies. Everything feeds into everything else. I began to read people like Nader and Packard. I set aside bits of my formal education and began to think.