I wonder if Churchs sells corrected grain more for the aesthetic properties, which I imagine some people like, than to "hide" blemishes or to use cheaper grades of leather?
Interesting post, Tony. I know this will sound like typical MB crap, but the guy who runs Palliser's Mexican factories is a buddy of mine from law school. He strongly recommends the lower grade, corrected products for anybody with little kids. It's far more damage and stain resistant, at least as upholstery, than the full grain, higher grade stuff he makes. The factories are something to see, especially the hide storage areas. The aroma of the hides is incredible.
Shocking; there are shades of grey to this!
Much like everything else, there are different levels of quality within the family of "corrected grain leather". This will add a new layer of complication to my life (I'm being honest).
I imagine that you're right - that some corrected grain is better than the rest and that it does have it's uses (e.g. non-cordovan shoes for when it's raining) but I full grain has a slightly different look that I find more pleasing.
I suppose corrected grain leather may not always be a shortcut but it seems like cost savings are so important and consumers so apathetic that it probably is most of the time.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2007-12-14 06:53:33)
This thread is worth looking at again since the topic has resurfacred on Andyland again.
While I didn't like the "customer service" at Churchs on Madison Avenue when it changed, I was happy with my shoos, corrected grain though they were.
Last edited by The_Shooman (2008-06-22 02:51:27)
'Two for £25' is now 'Two for £30'. They are more clumpy than Trickers. They outgun most gunboats. The leather creases in a different way - but the shiny, plain black Oxford is serviceable. I see worse on the feet of most workers in The City.
That is another of life's mysteries. Where is all this quality footwear actually worn ? Or is it just photographed and put back in a cupboard.