Tribalism generally. Does anyone want to be truly exclusive. I mean have things made that they have only? Some might, some might very well indeed. However, it occurs to me that if you have something too exclusive then you may not have an audience who can appreciate it or envy it.
True they might know that it was made especially for you but how would they really know this? It might be that they just haven’t seen it on someone else yet. More to the point, even a self styled master of the universe needs minions to admire and envy him.
Someone has got have lusted for what you have to be impressed with the fact that you have it. Likewise, others even a small exclusive set of others mind you, has to be aware and have even chosen the same or like items to appreciate that you are part of the inner circle. Being an original might not be as rewarding as being part of an exclusive circle. This might not only reinforce the old adage that it’s lonely at the top; it’s sometimes a waste of effort.
Younger men want something completely different, more mature men are more interested in fit and quality and do not mind as much seeing a similar pattern on the right sort of person because it validates the set or the inner club or circle. So generally, although the English like to be different it has to be within a certain set of parameters and the more mature you are, the less important absolute individualism is and the more comfort derived from seeing the right sort of people wearing your shirt or a recognized one from a given source.
If you don’t care at all and just want the fit and the feeling of custom, then plain white and blue shirts are for you. No one will know the source of the material and only you will know it was custom made but for many well dressed Englishmen, that is titillation enough.
I know that I messed around with tribalism with my tailor. I unwittingly moved around or changed details that signaled that I was a customer to the other men who visited them. I won’t do that anymore. It announces that I am part of the club, of the same circle and set. I did so because I thought that this was the correct way to do it from old books or rules of thumb. But I was wrong because these things are not record-able with any consistency and are often reported by outsiders who do not understand the gist of tribalism. It isn’t important that people outside the group (presuming the group to be an influential and much traveled one by me) to think you got it right but it is essential for persons within it to recognize that you have.
Just wish there were a few more of my fellow tribesmen about. For example, today I went out on some errands dressed in a "California tux"--a rather tired old blazer, some cheap khakis, a blue and white plaid linen shirt and my chili A-E Stockbridges. My wife got quite angry about how overdressed I was. You'd think I were going forth in a frock coat and a topper. However, by going forth in my simple California tux I was wildly dissonant in appearance from nearly all the males I saw in the course of my errands...almost as much so as if I had been wearing the frock coat and topper. A sad state of affairs, I think.
Tribes and tribalism - interesting choice of subject! First of all I dress for myself! Yes, I've got some adverse reactions, heck with them, let them live with frustration and envy, it is their choice. On the other hand, I am constantly better treated - in terms of respect, quality of service, smiles, etc. - than people that have ill fitting clothes, poorly maintained shoes, or, let's say mildly, "funny choices" of colors, and I am speaking about unknown people: waiters, customs officers or flight attendants. On the other hand you have to avoid blatant display of "bling" (that is why I avoid Rolex's, gold with diamond cufflinks, etc). Nobody knows that my collar stays are sterling silver, and the only place on which I'd put a monograming on my shirts is on the front bottom (BTW monograming was a practical thing when everyone had white shirts, so they do not get mixed-up in the laundry shop), not on the cufflink or other visible place - just to show off. Remember Petronius's "Satyricon" and Trimalchio! The problem is that more and more people are going towards status symbols and goods rather than to quality - take for example the Porsche Cayenne - it is the epitome of "bling" car for me (and it goes for long with urban use of the SUV). I feel the difference on myself when is about fit and quality, not about the label or every thing else. On the other hand, trying to copy (not to emulate) the spirit of the 30 gives you the costume party that you can see on the Fedora Lounge or on the WAYWT on AAC Trad forum. It is like wearing a pirate's gown when you go at the sea-side, it has some link with, but you will look like a fool!