Yes, and he embarrassed himself, as well.  The blazers and trousers look gorgeous, but the logo mars them aesthetically and exemplifies tasteless commercialism.  Ditch the logo and they look classic.

LOL

i'm with you re. nakedness! welcome to the forums btw!

My wife used to be a big fan of Polo, and when she was more affluent, she gave me quite a few RL shirts, mostly featuring that damned polo player logo. I disliked the little polo player but endured him. I would not be caught dead displaying the new, jumbo-sized polo player. I agree with Horace: the damn polo player spoils the uniforms.

I have never quite understood why people want to turn themselves into billboards for clothing manufacturers. I can halfway understand, if one is crazy about Harley-Davidsons, the desire to wear a Harley-Davidson T-shirt (although doing so unfailingly brands you as riffraff), but the desire--and all the young fellows seem to have it--to pominently display clothing manufacturers' names like "Hurley," "Billabong" or "Ruca" across their chests totally eludes me.

As my tastes have matured, I have come to strongly dislike any garment that publicly displays writing on it or any kind of representational art beyond small images of gamebirds and the like on neckties and pocket squares.

I always say: get that horseshit off your shirts!

otherwise they're fine,  but that Polo logo hurts...

it's got no style and it ain't got no class,

just that little pony makes you look like an ass!