Last edited by Moose Maclennan (2009-04-09 01:37:34)
Last edited by The_Shooman (2009-04-08 06:32:02)
brown brogues
gray socks
cuffed bills khakis buttonfly
plain brown leather belt
blue/white gingham buttondown landsend shirt
brown tweed sport coat
Dessies, Levi's, Oxford, Crewneck, French crop
fresh out the barber shop
Last edited by The_Shooman (2009-04-09 08:46:28)
steppin out tonight for pre easter fancy dinner party and i m planning on the following
EG brown brogues
charcole gray socks
tan poplin suit
plain brown leather dress belt
white heavy startch ocbd
bow tie - navy and gold brooks #1
maybe the socks should be navy to?
No, I think you're fine.
Have fun!
Gets my vote on the whole. Has a great overall look to it.
Busting up the 'Harrington' orthodoxy needs doing by all of us.
Just been wearing my LL Bean Adirondack Barn Jacket instead of the ol' LL B. Field Coat. That makes a nice change too.
No disrespect, but Henri Lloyd has a bad, bad reputation in this neck of the woods in 2009. All the fault of Manc post-Perries.
Sorry, old boy. You're absolutely right, Mancs are Mancunians, i.e. the citizens of our very own Detroit. The 'Perry Boys' were around circa 1980-81, and their younger brothers were the ones who took Henri Lloyd, HH, Peter Storm and plenty of other good stuff - Timberland, Smedley, Burberrys', Lacoste - and hammered it into the ground. Frankly, it looks good on you, but that's because its in context. There is a story here - context-wise - which has nothing to do with Ivy vs. Trad or anything of that nature; it simply acknowledges the alien nature of US clothing in an English working class setting.
Well: the working class kids tended to acquire (by fair means or foul!) anything that was a status symbol. Lazy thinking would have you believe it was something to do with the right being in power here between 1979 and 1997, but that's just trendhounds like Elms and Hewitt trying it on...
Different cities adopted different styles, and I think HL was a northern thing - Manchester/Salford - whereas London was more Gucci, Prada and Aquascutum.
Trainers had been massive in Liverpool - especially Incontinence pants. A rather amusing book by Phil Thornton goes into the history of this. So does Hewitt, a bit.
I guess it goes back to our teddy boys from around 1952: spending most of what they earned on their gear. Then mods did much the same thing. Some of us Ivy fans have got into trouble with our wives for our spending habits!
So, to get this straight, was it the marine gear that the lads in Manchester and Salford were sporting? Neither, I think, is particularly near the coast, so sources of the stuff must not have been obvious. HL must have had a pretty high profile in the UK at the time to attract them. I mean, the chances of seeing an HL offshore jacket worn in Manchester must be infinitessimal compared to seeing a Barbour, so to copy and adopt the style is not at all obvious. What's doubly curious is that foulies are, even now, often not particularly comfortable to wear out of their intended environment. 20-25 years ago, they were far worse. Those boys were suffering for their style. And there's been a resurgence in 2009 or the style continues?
Well, Manchester and Salford are pretty close to Liverpool, and there might have been a marina. Boat shoes were definitely big for a while. It's now just casual-wear - not necessarily chavvie, but not good either. I mean, Bench is rock bottom, then HH, Fred Perry, HL (IMO). Barbour had their turn - the casual look changed sometimes week by week. London boys probably wouldn't be seen dead wearing Manc gear. Look on Ebay sometime, though - the UK site - and you'll sometimes see early 80s sportswear going for big money - the Borg trackie top for example. Stone Island is probably the last bastion - but the serious boys always removed the compass in case police intelligence were infiltrating their firms. Italian brands became the top status symbols for a while: Mandarina Duck etc. 'North Face' jackets are now ubiquitous and nasty.
Last edited by AQG (2009-04-10 11:58:24)
Yes, I had formed the impression, up until around this time last year, that North Face was, like, say, Vera Bradley, a solid east coast preppie brand. My daughter wanted a bag, and I treated her to a VB; never seen another, unlike Radley, which are everywhere over here. As soon as she bought herself a North Face coat, though, for a trip to Latvia, all the 'scrubbers' were wearing them. They're a bit like the old 'puffa' coats from many moons ago, worn by Ur-chavs from housing estates. Let's face it, old boy, English street fashion defies all reason, even to the English. What else can explain away the addiction to trousers tucked into socks and stupid Tibetan-style hats?
Ivy wearers are an absolutely tiny minority of oddballs like Uncle Russell, the Professor, Big John etc. We simply don't fit in (not that we'd want to, of course!), but what we wear doesn't often get us funny looks (Madras jackets apart) or chased down the street by howling mobs...
I like the sweater. I have an ancient merino job with a hole in it.
'Crunchy' is a new one on me - though I think I get the picture. Outdoors types? Like the super-duper blonde chick in the Sebago catalogue?