It's nice to see this forum up and running with many of the regulars from the other fora participating.
I particularly enjoy the numerous and informative posts of Marc Grayson. I never could quite understand why a man of his deep knowledge and extensive experience with fine menswear should be exiled from the major fora! He moves in a much more rarified stratum of this game than I do, but he's always interesting.
It's also great to see my old mate Gr8man the Shooman re-emerge from cyber-limbo. Never could figure out what he did to incur banishment by the dread "Malinda."
Anyway, I plan to drop in regularly!
Welcome to Devil's Island my friend. Or as people who really want to learn about stylishness my call it:
Oh brave new world, that has such people in it.
Welcome Dr Libourel. Yes, Mr Graysons writings are indeed impressive.
Regards: The Shooman.
Welcome.
Of course, we are like the expats of old, harbored here from the draconian substance abuse of that latent Big Sister.
Last edited by Incroyable (2006-03-23 01:15:02)
Welcome to Buff's Bastards, my learned sir.
I really do admire the fact that you've probably assembled the greatest (cost:quality ratio) shoe wardrobe ever. A lesson to all of us who are inclined toward extended fits of parsimony. I'm looking to get a pair of AE's in a nice British tan or brown chestnut with cap-toe medallion and a bit of brogueing. Though I haven't decided whether to go derby or oxford. Any suggestions you have would be appreciated.
(And indeed any suggestions by anyone else on any other brand that fits the above would be much appreciated).
Actually, Horace, the real champion A-E collector is not me but Ask Andy regular FlatSix. The Jeffersonville, Ohio, outlet is to him what Cabazon is to me. I believe his A-E wardrobe is somewhere up in the high 30s or low 40s, maybe even more. I am actually almost relieved that the new A-E lasts don't fit me well. Otherwise I probably would already have run out of room for my shoe purchases!
For what you are looking for, Horace, the recently discontinued A-E Colton in chestnut would be your best bet if the #0 last is compatible with your foot. You might want to darken the burnished chestnut a bit, but that is no great feat. I don't believe A-E has a medallion captoe in their current lineup. The Colton is, of course, a blucher. A-E has not manufactured a medallion captoe bal in the time since I got "hooked" on A-E's about three years ago. Some examples of the Colton's predecessor, the very similar Lexington on the #1 last, might still be available at some of the outlets or elsewhere.
How can you tell men who hang out on clothing forums?
They are the ones who are always talking of adding another closet, or remodeling an existing one to hold more absolutely necessary wardrobe.
With only a couple of exceptions, I met everyone I know in person on the fora while browsing Tony's fauna.
Bit of a stretch that. I humbly apologize.
Sorry if my use of the plural "fora" strikes anybody as pretentious. I studied and read Latin almost every day of my life for the better part of 16 years so using Latin plural forms just kind of comes naturally to me. I have sometimes annoyed readers of the magazines I've edited by pluralizing the products of the Brazilian gunmaker Taurus as "Tauri."
I suppose it's pretty hit or miss what Latin words we pluralize in the Latin fashion and which we don't. Consider how abrasive the following sounds:
The alumnuses were gathering at their respective college campi.
Last edited by Horace (2006-03-27 23:32:30)
My Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage states that it can go either way. They cite the use of "none" as a plural as far back as King Alfred. Other notables who use "none" as a pural include the translators of the King James Version, John Milton, W.H. Auden, G.K. Chesterton and Lewis Carroll, to name a few.
In concluding the page and a half of fine print the editors devote to this topic, they state:
"Clearly, none has been both singular and plural since Old English and still is. The notion that it is singular only is a myth of unknown origin that appears to have arisen in the late 19th century. If in context it seems like a singular to you, use a singular verb; if it seems like a plural, use a plural verb. Both are acceptable beyond serious criticism."