I've been following Toffeeman's, then Gibson Gardens', postings with enormous interest for some while now.  Although he and I don't quite see eye to eye over modernist art, architecture or design perhaps, there is a definite wavelength thing going on, similar to the one I have enjoyed for a year or more now with Staceyboy.
Specifically, GG is unafraid to articulate certain feelings which may be slightly unfashionable in UK Ivy, and by doing so he leads us not into temptation, but points up the aspirational side of Ivy style in its purest sense: removing it from the council ghetto circa 69 back to its collegiate environment, then re-importing it as the finest entity imaginable, so subtle in its execution that even the most ambitious, most fastidious mod from 1960-62 (or thereabouts) might have had difficulty keeping up.  His swipes at the later, Marriott-type mods and skinhead fashion are inspirational IMO, and appeal to me in a very personal sense because I managed to go from useless school-leaver without hope or ideas to university graduate and professional (only after a lot of hard graft), yet dragging a fair amount of chippiness behind me.  The benefit I have derived from reading and studying his comments, and Jim's on Strachan and Lally has been unlimited, informing my choices on a virtually daily basis: in terms of colour, texture, materials, silhouette, everything.  So: the complexity of simplicity.  'Mods', if I may be so bold, probably cared too much, whereas the classic Ivy style speaks of confidence in a very deep and broad sense without any trace of 'flashiness'.  The devil remains in the detail - of course it does - but the 'boldness' is often ditched in favour of clothing more offbeat, such as Madras or seersucker jackets for the warmer days.  I don't think GG is actually a devotee of either, but they are at least a small gesture of defiance in an England which is baggy, scruffy, outsourced, acrylic, ugly, aggressive, stupid, un-co-ordinated and brain-dead.  Just for starters. 

Our style requires thought, thought and more thought.  Gibson injects a welcome amount of pure intellect into the forum, which builds on the knowledge that comes from, say, Chris H.  Who else would have posted about Jonathan Miller, thus avoiding the obvious?  It's taking us far from repellent youth aggression and pleasingly into the realms of black and Jewish culture - and WASP when we want it - and that's exactly where we need to be right now.