One For Bop wrote:
No I think this is the type of thing that makes someone different from just being a fashionista, it is showing a real interest in the design of clothes, trouble is when you know what you want in your head and how viable that is in creating from either RTW or M2M, I think you have to at some point accept the limits of your proportions on getting the look you want. But it is important to explore these things, I'm lucky I work at a place with a tailor, so I get to try these things out, and even with that, you get gaffs and f@ck ups, clothes are bloody hard things to get right, which I guess is why it becomes addictive in trying to get them right, if anything is too easy it doesn't hold your attention. I'll let you know how I get on, I would still recommend getting a pair of Pakeman 5-pockets in the sale in a dark colour, everything is good, apart from the trouser cuff, they are a good basis, shame the quality of the fabric on the twill pair I have isn't just that little bit better.
I will definatley check Pakeman out, thanks again Bop.Youre right about excepting your body shape and its limitations this Ivy lark is difficult for big ens which is why i do not go on esty anymore it is depressing.I think a decent tailor is key for a " Big boy" who likes things just so,i have been going to a master tailor
for a few years now.The man is a genius but i have to have wrestling matchs with him every time i want to have no break on my strides.He just does not get it and
he tells me he has never had anyone want their trousers taken up this way before he met me.
I'd recommend a 13'' rise if you are anything like me for size, 12'' sits too low for the 'ivy' look, keep to 9'' on the knee, and try and sneak the cuff in just under 8'', and with any luck you should get there. You might find the seat in pakeman generous, and you might want to keep to 8'' on the cuff just to reflect how they fit high up the leg and seat. But try them on see how you go.
Sorry scrap that, I meant 12'5 on the rise, I was going from memory, just measured you want 12.5'', 13 will give you the age'd look. I think the Pakeman size 40'' sit at just over 12'', to give you some idea a 519 bedford has a drop of 12'' on a 36'' waist, so your playing inside classic proportions.
One For Bop wrote:
Sorry scrap that, I meant 12'5 on the rise, I was going from memory, just measured you want 12.5'', 13 will give you the age'd look. I think the Pakeman size 40'' sit at just over 12'', to give you some idea a 519 bedford has a drop of 12'' on a 36'' waist, so your playing inside classic proportions.
Right oh Bop, any thigh measurement?
4F Hepcat wrote:
^The Nettletons are good, but not as good as vintage Florsheims. The rain damaged ones still need to go to an upmarket shoe cobbler, for which the local one cannot be trusted, I am thinking of the Royal Treatment in Amsterdam. The only question is time, or posting!
You still haven't posted pics of that shirt you cut through with a Stanley knife. Post pics of sodden shoes too. Anything else? hehe
Oo Bop Sh'bam wrote:
The rise is high enough on what i got fxh, the bit that bothers me is cutting a line across the ankle bone with out that spare inch flapping about i think i'm nearly there, i did document it with some photo, i'll post them over to you and say what was done, see what you think
Fly over here for a week and I'll sort you out in person.
woofboxer wrote:
12 - 10 - 8 for me ..... that is thigh - knee - cuff.
ooh ahh - snap - we are twins - this is what I do on all jeans, and casual trousers. Most wool odd pants and suits I go 9" bottom and down to 8.5" at most. I spend a lot of time perving on mens bottoms and seeing what works best.*
* and no - that doesn't make me a bottom feeder.
One For Bop wrote:
Sorry scrap that, I meant 12'5 on the rise, I was going from memory, just measured you want 12.5'', 13 will give you the age'd look. I think the Pakeman size 40'' sit at just over 12'', to give you some idea a 519 bedford has a drop of 12'' on a 36'' waist, so your playing inside classic proportions.
Superb nerdish attention to detail Bop, what this forum's all about ! But in truth I can't see that 0.5" is going to make that much difference, the reality is that clothes move around on your body. No one's going to notice a small difference in the rise or length if you are walking along or sitting down. But then when you're striking a pose in the middle of the room at some trendy hang out and chicks are checking out the size of your rise .............
One For Bop wrote:
Beautiful ratios Woof, what was the rise on those Libertos again?
12.75" - not 13" or 12.5"- 12.75" ![]()
The main difference is sitting under the navel, than over the top, I know it's not much, I quite like to have the rise just about cover the last button on a shirt placket. I've been using the Makers as a standard for that.
Last edited by One For Bop (2012-08-18 03:56:51)
woofboxer wrote:
Superb nerdish attention to detail Bop, what this forum's all about ! But in truth I can't see that 0.5" is going to make that much difference, the reality is that clothes move around on your body. No one's going to notice a small difference in the rise or length if you are walking along or sitting down. But then when you're striking a pose in the middle of the room at some trendy hang out and chicks are checking out the size of your rise .............
True - half an inch doesn't make much difference in most places - or so all the women tell me.
But my firm opinion, based on years of observation, is that in cuff opening 1/2 an inch can make or break. It does depend on shoes length and shape though.
I feel utterly naked if my waistband falls below my navel... One reason I hate jeans. On a casual shirt, I like to be able to see only 4 closed shirt buttons from my belt up, that is, if I have the collar button undone. Only then do I know the rise is just right. Oh, and if my nuts aren't being sliced down the middle.
Last edited by Worried Man (2012-08-18 09:04:34)
It's the rise more than anything that gives the look a real vintage feel. Worried Man, you got it. The Woolster, he got it too.
Do you wear exclusively vintage for 'the look' WM? Or do you know any modern brand that cuts the mustard?
There's just no way I can wear pants upto my naval. 10-11 suits me best, cuff can be varied 7.5-8.25. Slim but not too tight.
I'm wearing some Bombay bloomers shorts tonight ( WW2 Vintage).
They're just kissing my navel.
^ Lucky pants they are.
Liam,
Vintage is definitely easier to find a good rise, but it's a whole other story as they usually have pleats, cuffed hems, moth holes, not to mention I'm quite slim so rarely do they come close to fitting. It's hard to find the pair that has it all, and even then I'm looking at plenty of alterations. For daily use I like the Brooks "Clark Fit" and the Lands End "Tailored Fit." Lands End "Traditional Fit" have good height, but they sure are saggy on my arse. They work with a little finagling. With sales you can pick the stuff up super cheap. The LE wools and flannels are ok too. Lightweight quality for sure, but reasonably priced, especially if you need to do some experimenting with alterations.
fxh wrote:
4F Hepcat wrote:
^The Nettletons are good, but not as good as vintage Florsheims. The rain damaged ones still need to go to an upmarket shoe cobbler, for which the local one cannot be trusted, I am thinking of the Royal Treatment in Amsterdam. The only question is time, or posting!
You still haven't posted pics of that shirt you cut through with a Stanley knife. Post pics of sodden shoes too. Anything else? hehe
Oh yee of little faith! The mother-in-law has sewn the damage on the shirt, which means it will be suitable worn under a jumper, so the terminal damage was not as final as I initially concluded.
I will post photos soon along with some 17" shirts and 36" chinos I intend to sell, but today I have a date with the lawn mower and the Delft jazz festival this afternoon. The rest will be with beer!
LOW!!!
Soggy's worn lower
And looked better in them.
It’s hot, hot, hot, just returned from lovely late lunch of spaghetti alle vongole
Washed down with a couple of glasses of vino, heaven.
Gant turquoise linen short sleeve untucked, maybe not for purists but no branding
Nice collar roll and feels right on a day like this.
Uniqlo Khakis
No Belt, No Socks, No break
Burgundy Bass Weejuns.
Sounds right up my street, Armchaired.
Liam Mac wrote:
Sounds right up my street, Armchaired.
Thanks Liam is that the Clobber or the spaghetti ? lol
All of it Armchaired! Sounds like the perfect Sunday, to me.
![]()
Going over session notes for studio tracks. Me in foreground with white polo, levis, timex. G. Cunnerson in the back with his usual, boring green shorts and white T.
Plain white Brooks
Camel Paine slipover
Levis chinos
Italian dessies