Last edited by colin (2012-02-05 11:45:19)
Last edited by Sammy Ambrose (2012-02-05 09:00:50)
Note: I gave the firing squad episode a tiny bit of a Hollywood makeover but the essence is honestly true!
When you call Dostoevsky a genius, do you mean Bruce Forsyth type Genius or are you speaking out of context again?
Last edited by Drink (2012-02-05 10:26:16)
Come to think of it, what's the alternative? And when was the last time a Labour frontbencher uttered the 'S' word in public? Even Balls seems to want nothing better than 'a more caring capitalism', rather than letting the market rip. The Labour Party was useless even by the time MacDonald got his hands on it - although it continued to attract people of extraordinary ability. It was pathetic at a local level, especially in London, by 1939-40. Its members now are often a joke. Just watch Conference this year. Well-meaning idiots duped by smug women like Caroline Flint.
All the political parties are owned and corrupt, the coalition is no different.
One only needs to look at the Met Police Force - no democracy with values of justice would tolerate its sleaze.
There is no alternative, its all the same rotten borough.
Well, there is one alternative, devolution of not only the nation states within the union, but of whole counties and regions too.
The Met - remember 'Our Friends In The North'? "Obey the law - even though we don't".
Not convinced that form of devolution would work, though I'm happy that the Welsh get to do some of their own business.
I suppose it highlights a big problem for (New) Labour. If the general consencus rarely critiques the suggestion that "there is no alternative", including New Labour, then they're always going to look like they lack direction or are weak - if it's a weaker version of the coalition's plans. Or at least Ed Milliband isn't a force of nature...
I can't help but think that Labour will have to properly explore the idea of a more moral/less selfish capitalism. An alternative to neo-liberalism. Of course, the current ideas put forward are largely rhetoric rather than anything stronger. It could of course lead to nothing or be unachievable. Just my random thoughts.
Last edited by colin (2012-02-05 13:51:25)
It is by no accident that the Milliband brand, and reflective of the party that chose them, that their surname is very close to millipede, a very nasty recurring motif in Burroughs cut-up novels. He was clearly cutting into the present day Labour party.
Better Ed Miliband than Burroughs: possibly the worst and most pretentious author of the post-war period. Oh, but, then, of course, there was Vidal, Pynchon, Mailer, Salinger... Ed might be out of his depth, but his heart - unlike that of his odious brother - is probably in the right place.
Last edited by formby (2012-02-05 15:03:44)
Yes, but will wearing a navy blazer with grey pants make me look like a Marxist security guard in a novel by Dostoevsky?
Is "Prince Myshkin" a good name for my Trad blog?
I suspect that, for the Soviet Union, the phrase 'Marxist-Leninist' became just a convenient smokescreen. Not sure if a monster like Beria whispered it into the ears of the young women he raped. What did Russia become, under Stalin? An imperial power. Stalin might have made a better, more traditional Tsar than poor Nicholas 11 (oh, yes, another anti-semite). The Left doesn't exactly hold the monopoly on verbal and written abuse - but it's a pretty good practioner. No, I'm not talking about the average Labour Party member, I'm talking (mostly) about their Trotskyite enemies. The Right tends to be craftier.
...and on a lighter note:
Kids can no longer handle Dickens.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-16896661
Pleased to report that, in Year Seven, my daughter wrote an extended essay on 'Northanger Abbey'. Mostly, though, even when they do read, the books are junk.
Last edited by Liam Mac (2012-02-05 15:00:46)