Last edited by Patrick Bateman (2007-04-24 21:32:26)
Further, even if we assume that the reporter completely fucked over this poor kid, he (the kid) should have realized that a reporter might have their own agenda which could include taking quotes out of context, supplying incorrect/inflated/lazily researched prices, and generally making the subject look like a complete fucking tool.
Last edited by Patrick Bateman (2007-04-24 21:34:56)
I can't say that I have a problem with this fellow's dress on at all.
It's a helluva lot more than I'd be willing to spend, but it seems like it does fall within the territory of some here. He looks better than a great many people I see in offices.
Douchey quotes are another story and serve to remind us that people are more (or less) than the sum or taste of their apparel.
I think he should try not to make the withered prune face at the camera, but that's not a sartorial matter.
Last edited by Coolidge (2007-04-24 22:49:54)
The first thing that came into my mind is that he's certainly a "Barclay's Banker"!!
Sorry, couldn't resist it.
S
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/27/AR2007022701651.html
Ahh, another humble millenial....
Great job boomer parents!
http://code.tv/index.html?bcpid=78334397&bctid=245987660
Background here: http://www.nysun.com/article/42000