Should have linked these to the York article:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4B2a6l6wM2k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMThz7eQ6K0
On a different note, but same period.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgCZN1rU5co
Last edited by formby (2013-10-19 04:30:54)
Geezerdom - when the working class still aspired to be suited and booted. Bury me in my cravat.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2466412/Real-life-Del-Boy-revealed-Wheeler-dealer-inspired-David-Jasons-portrayal.html
Just read the Sloane Ranger piece. Good reading and most it is right but I am not convinced by the conclusion that Cameron and Co have it in the bag at all.
Absolutely not, Old Bean.
Last edited by doghouse (2013-10-19 08:50:24)
Hep - the original idea was your own and I especially liked the description of Bliar! I never could stand him and I just don't understand how more people didn't see through him and Brown and Mandy - especially when the very sincere John Smith was still more than a distant memory. It's hard to pinpoint the time when politicians thought that there was vote-gain mileage in dumbing themselves down and giving people what they think that they want rather than what they need - and it has not been confined to Britain either - look at the USA and chunks of Europe: Greece, Cyprus, Spain, Portugal, Italy and so on. Maybe there will be a change one day but I don't think that Farrage has much oomph (unfortunately) and this is reflected in the fact that he looks more like Worsel Gummage or Rab C Nesbitt than we might like; plus the way back down the Shit Creek of the EU might be more arduous than trying to make the system work. For a start there is all the regulation that flows from European diktats as well as all the financial entanglements. There would be a lot of time, effort and expense in disengaging.
Well done dudley, dress as well as you write and you'll get my vote come election day
What is interesting is the difference in England between the "gentleman", the "Bounder", the "Spiv" and the "dandy".
I cant go into it here but it seems like the gentleman and the dandy are separated from the other two (or at least the bounder) by a somewhat indifferent attitude in sexual appetite.
The Bounder seems to possess a voracious appetite for female company and tweaks his outfit with color and pattern to attract females. The Spiv is usually a non gentleman or a foreign passport holder pretending to be British; or worse a foreign passport holder indulging in their own tawdry, tacky taste (TTT). At most a Spiv is "gent" which is a cheap, nasty-nice imitation of a gentleman. You know the sort that tells other people they are wrong thinking they've proven they're better but accomplishing just the reverse.
The American Dandy lacks the association with being effete on the whole. Well, by English standards anyway. Wasn't the original American Dandy the 'Dude' ?
Not sure.
Final thought for this moment: Interesting that the definition of a chap being a 'Counter Jumper' used 100% the language of retail.
Last edited by formby (2013-10-19 16:51:06)