Last edited by David (2008-02-16 05:11:01)
Awesome work, Tony. Look forward to future essays.
The forgotten style indeed.
And there's no reason why it should be.
(That Ol' French Cut is forgotten too, but it informed most of the fashionable suits of the 70's...)
May I echo, hollowly, David above: 'A fascinating read Tony and a major piece of work. You have expanded the discussion of American style no end with your essay & I thank you for it.'
Rare enough to find original work and thoughts on the MBs, may I say as a passive bystander/wag/poseur.
Very perceptive and worthwhile bit of reading. More please.
Very well done Tony.
RE the Updated American vs. the Ivy league
Im beginning to have an affinity for them both. Especially as I have discovered that I look equally good (though I don't think better) in 2 button as 3-2.
What I still dont like about a lot of the new stuff is the really shitty job done on the darts. Too much puckering, is my term for it, at the ends. Do a good job, and I'm sold.
Though, I must say, though in decent shape, Im not a weights or big boned guy so I think I am more compatible at the outset with the Ivy 3-2/No. 1 than many other men. And, as I have always, I still love the look of that rolled under top button, and the No.1's general uniqueness today.
Last edited by Coolidge (2008-02-20 19:45:05)
I enjoyed Tony's essay too, found it very informative and made things a lot clearer for me re-the American suit. When I first joined this forum a lot of what was being said went more or less over my head to be honest ( remember I'm not really a suit person ), but I'm beginning to see all the nuances and subtle differences and what have you between various styles. Interesting stuff anyhow.....
Thanks TV, great read. I'm not a fan of the look, but the history and analysis were fascinating.
No, I've never liked the "Updated American" suit--to me, it seems to incorporate aspects of English and Ivy League tailoring in a completely unsatisfying way. The shoulders are built out, but the waist isn't nipped enough to create that sharp British shape--instead, you have a relatively full-cut jacket with big shoulders, which tends to look sloppy. The darts don't shape the jacket enough to justify their distracting presence. The trousers are baggy and reverse-pleated, which, to my mind, is exactly wrong. The center jacket vent is retained, but minus the charming hook. Side vents would look better on the Updated American jacket, I think.
It seems an unhappy compromise, eschewing all of the coolest features of its forebears and resulting in an undistinguished, mediocre, bland presentation. Ironically, the UA suit seems much dowdier than a well-cut Ivy League number, which at least nods to to the whole minimalist/mod thing.
To be sure, stylish, attractive iterations of the UA suit exist, and flatter some (like JFK), but on balance I'd have to categorize it as my least favorite silhouette.
^ I think you may need to read the article again. My point was the two styles are quite similar in overall shape and differ in the details only, for the most part. Look at the photos of GHWB and Clark: there's very little difference between those suits.
I think I'm basically agreeing with you--it's the details of the Updated American suit that bug me. It has the easy cut of the Ivy League suit, but eliminates the cool bits (3/2 lapel, hook vent, flat front trousers, a focus on clean lines), replacing them with nods to European styling which don't suit the shape, leaving you with something neither fish nor fowl.
Just one idota's opinion.
^ Key point I think.
Yup. That's pure American alright.
It draws on the Old World & it makes it new.